You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: MARK PASSIO – New Episodes Of What On Earth Is Happening CAN NOT Be Broadcast – HERE'S WHY
Anarchapulco seems like a good venue to spread freedom-oriented ideas, but I've looked into the organizer and it doesn't convince me at all, he kinda stinks..
Jeff Berwick has changed a lot over the years. He used to be an alcoholic and is clean now. You could get the stream conferences to get a feel for what the event would be like. It's not for everyone, but there are a lot of people I know who attend and I will be attending in 2019. I personally think it's worth it. But that'sjust my opinion :)
Yes, I've noticed it, and that's good, I guess. I was referring to the scams. There's more than one person that have lost lots of money trusting him, as far as I understood (well, they could ALL be lying, of course, but still..). I'm also aware that he said that actually he was scammed in the first place, ok, but he should have repaired the damages done to those who trusted him with their money, and as far as I know he didn't. Am I wrong? In case I'm right, there's not really much use to then blabber about natural law, don't steal and such.
As for the rest I think an event like Anarchapulco could at least have a good use.
I agree that he should have been more on the ball and the other organisers should have read the memo. Mark Passio not getting his audio and being told what he was told was a fail on their part. For what happened 5 years ago, I'll have to research more, I don't have enough knowledge about it.
For me Anarchapulco is more than just the organisers and I'm not going for those people. I'm going for the speakers and for other people who will be there, buddies of mine from Steemit and people who are into alternative media and alternative healing, people like me who are into natural law and freedom and such. That's what hypes me up about it personally.
I get it though, Jeff Berwick is the name associated with the event, so his reputation bears a lot of weight for a lot of people, and when he drops the ball and someone is not respected the way they should be, it has an impact. It breaches trust. That will have to rebuilt.
Sure, I understand that. I think it's a good venue for this reason, that's why I have mixed feelings about the event, it's great on one side but there's an element of suspicion on the other, for me.
I get that. An event like that needs to garner trust, not just with attendees, but with the speakers too, and when organisers fail to do that, it's understandable that it will tarnish their name and reputation.