I thought the interviewers showed impeccable manners. The journalists are unable to be present at the meetings, and their only opportunity to acquire information from the attendees is therefore outside of the meetings. That is not due to the journalists failing to seek access, but due to the attendees excluding them, so necessitating the work of the journalists being confined to attendees outside the meetings.

On more than one occasion, @lukewearechange expressed willingness to interview attendees by appointment. I did not hear offers of appointments from the attendees.

Is there a specific instance of lack of etiquette or manners on @lukewearechange's part you can refer me to? I saw not one. The choice of venues was not his, but his attempted interviewees, so that is not a charge of rudeness you can lay at his feet, but something engineered by the Bilderbergers.

This is an event, and the attendees and their participation, that is of significant import to people not invited to attend, and our lives are impacted by these meetings and people. We do have a need to know that is not otherwise met than by the work of @lukewearechange and his peers.

Do you have any constructive suggestions for how journalists might more politely inquire as to the actions of the attendees? I'm sure, given @lukewearechange's personable and polite inquiry demonstrated in this video, he would be interested in them.

I know I am.

I suspect, however, that you have none, nor care to comment on the fact that reporting on Bilderberg meetings is impossible to do other than as this video shows, because Bilderberg excludes reporters, not because @lukewearechange is rude.

I think you owe him an apology you will not undertake.

That's on you.