It appears, at least on this issue, that the only propaganda going on is by you. It must be a slow news day when someone feels compelled to condemn officials for immediately stepping forth about a attack on a child. Granted they didn't know at that moment the child was lying but if she hadn't been there was a sincere potential that at that moment there was someone out there willing to attack a child, calling immediate attention to that was warranted because children are some of the most vulnerable members of our society. Doing anything to ward off or discourage another attack was crucial and I applaud them for that. The attack didn't garner as much attention on my google search as did the fact the attack was a hoax. Therefore there was far greater coverage of the hoax then the attack, now if the main stream media or government officials were complicit to spread propaganda they would have buried the story of the hoax to serve their "supposed" agenda. When you stand there and say things like "There's nothing irrational about rejecting a religion and culture that is at odds with our western christian standards" to which to a certain extent I agree with you when it comes to radical Islamic beliefs, it shows a total disregard and bias on your part to paint all Muslims with a broad brush. For what you just did there leaves you no less guilty then the charges you levied against the government of insulting the Muslims by using them as propaganda. Your statement that the government broke its own laws by 1. "doing anything intended to cause some other person to be suspect of having committed an offense that the other person has not or to divert suspension away from himself" and 2 "reporting an offense has been committed when it has not been committed" also leaves you just as guilty as the claims you made against the government. You stood there and accused someone (just like the girl accused someone) (and the government said someone) of having caused a crime to be committed by breaking up with someone, by falsely accusing that someone of being gay and that personal dispute among gay men lead to a devastating bombing. For it would surely seem to me that any individual who had a partner that they knew would reek harm upon the Muslim community in anger over a break up and keep it to himself would be complicit. Despite your allegations, in article after article that I read on the bombing moments ago it has been firmly established that he was a right wing extremist by the postings on his social media accounts and the organizations that he belonged to, that doesn't mean he will be found guilty of being a right wing terrorist just that it points in that direction, the truth will be established in a court of law. For even though people often don't want to comes to terms with it but terrorist can come in all sorts of colors.