You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: CNN rebranding to KNN?
I don't think communism really gives a shit about feminism, but feminism is a form of communism. And I don't mind them being at the Olympics, but they're there for a political statement. Praise their athletes, but not that political statement, which is obvious propaganda. But I guess CNN agrees with their message... I dunno why that is surprising to me, though.
Also, I tried editing what mistakes I found. Better, honey? :p
communism is worker control of the means of production, so anybody who wants social equality of any kind, as opposed to tyranny, better be a communist.
Anybody that stands for social equality is a communist, and inherently a tyrant. People are not equal. For example, you're a retard, not at all equal to the likes of Sam Harris. But you want the same? Fuck no!
try defining communism lmao. I want to see how bad you fail
economic equality leads to social equality.
Most social inequality is born out of the need to justify economic inequality when all else fails.
Oh no... muh inequality!
I don't give a shit. People are not equal. You are completely irrelevant, Sam Harris is not.
I never said the people should be equal, just that random chance shouldn't decide whether you starve to death or never have to do anything with your life
It's not random chance, it's skill in different fields. If you don't produce anything of value or provide no service, you starve. If one is totally worthless to everyone else, why should I, or anybody else for that matter, care for this person?
Nice straw man, but the main idea of communism is the labor theory of value. The workers get exactly what they produce back.
do research next time
also it is random chance.
The basis of capitalism, private ownership of the means of production, literally means those who control the means of production get resources through the labor of others. Being born lucky enough to have the social "right" to other's labor is luck.
leftism is based off the worker directly controlling the means of production and getting what they produce. All this shows is you have no understanding of political theory
All this shows you're a retard that has no idea what the concept of money is. And if workers get exactly what they produce ... I guess a metal worker should live off iron, then. And you can suck it with your "political theory" and your "research". I've lived in communism, and I can say that the best thing that ever happened in my country was killing the communists.
Communism doesn't try to inherently cater towards the genetic differences between the people, but rather their socio economic backgrounds; the main goal of communism is often to remove socio economic diffirences where everyone is on an equal playing field.
I have some stuff and studies to even to show that socio economic backgrounds matter more then genetics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/10/18/poor-kids-who-do-everything-right-dont-do-better-than-rich-kids-who-do-everything-wrong/?utm_term=.07d715e71bf1
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027656241000065X
https://campus.fsu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/academic/social_sciences/sociology/Reading%20Lists/Social%20Psych%20Prelim%20Readings/IV.%20Structures%20and%20Inequalities/2002%20Lareau%20-%20Invisible%20Inequality.pdf
http://www.nccp.org/publications/pdf/text_1145.pdf
Hope you stay open minded, and make decisions after you read these studies. Thank you for your time.
I am open minded. I'm fine with some help. But I've seen communism... and I don't care what sort of "difference" it tries to eradicate, all it does in the end is make everyone equally down trodden. Socio-economic differences are a symptom of genetic difference. One gains status by providing products / services. One comes up with these products / services if they're smart / able / skilled enough to do so. And they should not be equal to anybody else.
Unfortunately your open mindness gave you super powers to read and look through all 6 educational sources I've sent you all at the same time, it's quite amazing I wish I could document this; but unfortunately we do not live in a fairy tail world.
Socio-economic difference is a sympton of genetic difference, but it doesn't justify to luck of someone being born and getting the right to use the wealth of someone in a higher class. As you may have seen in my sources, poor students who do everything right still do worse then in life then rich ones who do everything wrong.
Wtf does "right" and "wrong" mean? And yes, someone born in riches deserves to be there. That's the whole point their parents worked for, to give their lineage a better chance in life. Nobody is entitled to any of those riches but the owner. What the kids do with them, is entirely their business. And if they do "everything wrong", they squander those riches, and in fact they often do, as most wealth is lost by the 3rd generation. Do well and work hard, and you're good, lazy around, you starve. Such is, and should be life.