RE: Paradise Lost; a tale of Fire, Destruction, and Corporate Negligence
Even more interesting than the PG&E connections are the outlandishly irregular patterns the fires have taken, especially considering the hair-riasingly similar fires that happened about a year ago in CA as well. Not to mention the date of the event.
From everything I have seen, raging fires do not discriminate one bit between neighboring houses and trees, these fires obviously have - again.
I have literally no idea what the truth is, but this is probably not merely about some douchebag company. It's the explanation peddled for peopele looking for some explanation that fits our contemporary narrative...
Still, form a system perspective: Good journalism you have delivered here. I just don't think it goes far enough considering the evidence that is emerging.
Thanks for the comment. As far as the Paradise, CA fires there is little evidence online that we can investigate at this point. My article is solely focusing on the Paradise,CA because it hits close to home; the city had a special place in my heart. I will leave all the other internet researchers to investigate the other fires. While I have looked extensively at the video footage from Paradise, I choose not to dive into the conspiratorial DEW ideas because there isn't much proof or evidence. Unless we are to accept that an arched energy current is a directed energy source 0:-). Arching currents will almost always seek to direct the arched energy into a grounding source. If the ground is literally covered in dried vegetation this becomes a recipe for a wild fire.
I strictly follow the money and the facts; I believe I have provided an accurate and thorough report on the Paradise, CA fires. But what I can share is that I have lived in Northern California and I have received fire training. Many people who are currently promoting the DEW ideology seem to have a weak understanding of how rapid spreading vegetation fires work. A lack of understanding is almost as dangerous as unmaintained dry vegetation near an energy grid-a recipe for disaster.
You mentioned that "raging fires do not discriminate one bit between neighboring houses and trees, these fires obviously have"Its crucial to understand that dead trees will always burn faster than live trees. This is why some trees burn and others do not. IMO it is also important to understand that houses are considered fuels for a fire. A house can and will burn before a live and healthy tree.This is because healthy trees have 10x+ moisture than dead and dried fuels. While fire does not discriminate, there are many factors that influence a fires path. Some houses can be lit on fire simply because the wind pattern at the time pushed embers to hit the roof. Wind patterns can shift rapidly, meaning some houses get hit with embers and then the fire moves so quickly that the ember pattern also shifts.Other major factors are things like if the gutters on houses had dried leaves because this would be fuels for feeding the fire. The proximity to homes and fallen powerlines/blown transformers is also a significant factor into why some houses burn and others do not.
I have lived in a high risk fire zone for long periods of time. There are certain protocols one should do to protect themselves from the risk of rampant fire. Aside from removing all fuels from your residential home area (dried plant matter, leaves, pine needles,pine cones, sticks-all of these things are fuels, and should not be near your home) Installing gutter sprinkles can save houses. Installing sprinklers that can keep your entire property saturated can also help. During fire season, I had my sprinklers going almost all of the time (benefits of having a well and a creek on the property was the unlimited amounts of water) and while the forest around my property did burn, my house never caught.
I actually lived in a community that actively removed fuels from the PG&E energy grid to prevent electrical fires. PG&E does not maintain the fuel vegetation within their grid. The way they handle vegetation is to spray vegetation with roundup to kill the plants. They do not remove dried fuels. Dried and dead fuels feed a fire. I was informed by a lineman that the typical protocol for clearing fuels from the energy grid is 20 ft high and 12 ft wide. This means that anything growing within that parameter should be removed-PGE just kills the vegetation with roundup/pesticides and moves along. The group I worked with removed fuels 30+ ft high and 20 ft wide.
Thank you so much for the further clarification, you do make some very solid and rational points here and I will not argue with your ability to estimate a fire's natural behavior, because as opposed to yourself I have never actively been involved with firefighting.
I guess these types of insight are what I would have normally expected from the MSM covering these events, but where solid reasoning could exist like you have provided here, we get but a thin shadow of an explanation offered by those who have repeatedly lied and have long become exposed for their ties to the powers that be. I say "would have expected of MSM" because I have long stopped expecting MSM to do any other work than spreading a certain narrative for an agenda that is rarely ever disclosed.
All the more reason to celebrate some actual journalists doing the work MSM should be doing. I can also thoroughly appreciate your stance on the energy weapon debate. I find the conclusion premature as well to say the least. It doesn't take some of the oddities away that my layman understanding has huge issues with, but I learned to trust my own senses rather than anyone else's explanation that doesn't jive with my inner being and experience. That said, until we get footage of these energy weapons in action demolishing property there could just as well be other explanation for it, and it's always a good idea to stick with the observable evidence rather than jumping to premature conclusions.
It's the same in any other field of inquiry, but you already know all that. Thanks again for your reply, i followed!