The trouble with the truth movement is that anybody that has a conflicting opinion is called a shill.
If someone like AJ reports information from another scource , does that make him controlled opposition.
Should people only report from their own investigations? I would argue that the information would be rather limited. People are entitled to be wrong or human. Every comentator has the right to present in their own style. Does someone have the right to make a living doing what they believe in ? Of course they do. Most of the anti establishment broadcasters make royalties from many avenues often to fund their operation and get their truth out.
If Jesus returned tomorrow he would be strung up again and the cheers from the peanut gallery would be shouting shill.
People like AJ are responsible for the spark that start many people on their journey for truth.
I would also argue the many decent honest truth seekers started their journey by hearing people like AJ before moving on to other avenues.
I would love to have the money and time to travel around with a bullhorn shouting down bilderbergers and other globalists but I dont have the income or royalties to pay for such an excercise. And I wouldnt be prepared for the people coming out of the woodwork calling me a shill.