You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Roger Stones' Twitter Account Gets Suspended
So you can't point to any tweet. You can't screenshot and post a tweet that violate their terms of services and then you insult Trump and Stone. No wonder no one takes libtards like you seriously. You make claims that you can't even prove.
Libtard?? LOLOLOL.
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmebwrRpVPhSWtuyBKJGDGHUALz5364Y4weDWgbfsTkQyF/image.png)
Buhbye Boris.
Where do we begin. Second tweet is does not violate the terms of service, he's just insulting lemonade which I don't believe is a violation given the guidelines you posted above. The theme with these two tweets are clear that he thinks Don Lemonhead lies a lot. So for the first tweet we can eliminate the hateful content from the list of potentially violated terms of service. Working our way up the list, there's no evidence that he harassed lemonhead from multiple accounts. There are clearly no threats and the account is not meant to send abusive messages to others. The only potential violation is inciting others to harass an account. In my opinion I don't think the first tweet violates that term of service because from the context, it seems like he's calling for people to call BS they feel when lemonade spews BS. That is considered confrontation, a news anchor being proven to report deceptive news would be humiliating since the job description of a news anchor includes honesty. And news anchors that lie would be punished because they won't appear to be as credible so a smaller spot light is put on their content. #ByeFelicia
Now that I assume your premise of they are a private corporation and they can do what ever they want is correct, which to be fair I agree with.
Keep trying Boris.
So when I ask questions that are inconvenient to your narrative you refuse to answer. You know the game, you know if you answer my questions, your talking points will be dead and your narrative will be debunked. I think I won this round. #ByeFelicia