You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Do you still think the regular news is giving you the facts? Context, and knowledge matter...
This is right out of "Rules for Radicals" which was written by Saul Alinsky who Hillary Clinton was in frequent contact with and even did a thesis on his works.
It does look like you
don't bother to back up the claims they make
;)
poking at Russia simply because we don't like Trump
Isn't it "accusing Russia even when we don't like Trump" instead of because?
But maybe that is the US / Europe difference again.
Not sure what you're getting at. The Saul Alinsky stuff is common knowledge if you even bother to look it up. Hillary has even written and spoken about it.
You see my claims you CAN research. You can look for yourself rather than expecting me to do it for you. I also am not telling you to NOT do it. The mainstream media often is. Their claims also cannot be researched to find the evidence as they've been caught frequently outright fabricating it lately. Right down to fake protest scenes. Right down to supposedly being in Iraq with air raid sirens, bombs, etc when it all was in front of a green screen and the original material has been leaked. Right down to supposedly having a person in New York interviewing someone in another country and having the same vehicle drive past BOTH locations only to find out it all happened in the same parking lot.
I'm not sure what you meant here. So I don't really know how to answer.
I will tell you that things between Russia and U.S. have not been bad and have actually been amiable until The Ukrainian events, which there is a possibility the U.S. had a lot to do with that, and now Trump,
There haven't been major tensions between Russia and the U.S. since Gorbachev and the fall of the Soviet Union until recently.
There is an agenda of endless war. If you look up the "Project for A New American Century" also known as PNAC they have a paper on Rebuilding Americas Defenses. It was written prior to 9/11. The group of people that wrote it were what would become known as the Neo-Conservatives. They finally were accepted and infiltrated BOTH parties of the U.S. when George Bush and Dick Cheney were elected. They actually desired a constant state of war and unrest. It gave opportunity to build and expand. Call it imperialism if you will.
Their agendas have continued under Obama, and Hillary and the things she says and her actions make it seem she is also very much in line with the Neo-Con agenda. Now this is the U.S.
It does seem Europe may have similar problems, as a lot was JUSTIFIED around the world due to Terrorism, 9/11, and terrorist acts in Europe.
What all of it means... I can't tell you on the european side. I can tell you what I've seen and researched for years on the U.S. side.
Same goes for "Russia hacked us" and "Chemtrails" and "The Earth is Flat" and "Pizzagate" and...
Sorry for made you write such a big answer.
Exactly as I wrote. People here are accusing Russia of everything while nobody likes Trump. So it cannot be because of Trump.
Yeah I noticed that in EU news as well. Yet it didn't seem to kick in until about a month after it was already going strong in the U.S. Appeal to Popularity doesn't prove anything. I believe it was actually a desired agenda as the cold war was very profitable, and a good way for certain power consolidation. So that definitely could be part of the motive though I don't know... just guessing. I do know the Russia narrative didn't appear until after emails for DNC started appearing then hugely related to Trump. They then seemed to spread. So I believe it started as heavily did as part of the anti-Trump agenda. I do believe it has grown into something quite beyond that as you indicate now.
Russia was under constant attack since crimea.
Not so much in the U.S. There was some news, but now a large amount of our news focuses on Russia.