You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Pro or anti gun ownership, the power of the NRA should concern you.

in #news7 years ago

As a gun owner you should know Background Checks already exist. Do you believe the official narrative that the Parkland shooter obtained his AR legally? This cat had a long history with police. If somebody is adjudicated mentally defective or has been committed to a mental institution, he is prohibited from possessing a firearm under federal law. However, according to USA TODAY

Gun buyers are seldom turned down because of mental illness. From 1998 to 2014, the FBI rejected 16,669 potential gun buyers because a background check found a mental health adjudication, about 1.4% of the roughly 1.2 million background checks that resulted in a denial.

What is the role psychiatric drugs and the FBI's use of such patsies play? Political agendas are afoot here, friend.

Sort:  

wait no, I am not talkinf about particular Parkland shooter here, and I am well aware that the "bad" guys, will get their weapons anyway they want, legally or illegally. I do believe everyone should own weapons, I just believe we should have stricter background checks to make sure and eliminate the probability that it does not actually fall into wrong hands, I am not talking about banning guns and all that. I am not exactly from America, I had just read otherwise. I apologize if I was wrong.

Background checks are already strict enough, sir. But Trump agrees with you. He has some pretty good ideas on how do deal with this, including training and arming teachers. Predators always target the weak.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.24
JST 0.036
BTC 95282.29
ETH 3279.60
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.07