You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: EPIC: Google's Leaked Document On Their Censorship Of The Web: 'The Good Censor' - What I Learned About Their Logic & How Steem Can Leverage Their Failures. (Part 1)

in #news6 years ago

The only issue I have with this otherwise excellent article and inspiring and insightful message that underpins it is that you use the term judgement while it seems you mean prejudices/bias when you say "judgement laden and almost psychotic" as judgement just as discernment isn't inherently wrong or bad and even bias or prejudice can be valuable, though for the most part they are used to refer to unpleasant and negative sentiments. I think to deny expression of prejudice or bias even if wrong won't be beneficial to healing the trauma as those things ought to be considered and confronted but won't happen if denied any more than denying people the same respect of expressing their feelings and frustrations.

Posted using Partiko Android

Sort:  

Thanks for reading!
The topic of judgement is a huge one and I am very tired here now, so can't reply in full. As far as I am concerned judgements always involve a denial of some kind. This needs to be felt to be understood. Judgements have us thinking that x is y, in a rigid and limiting way that does not allow for change and deeper insights.

'Dogs are scary' is a judgement - when the truth was really that 'I was once bitten by a dog and feel fear that has not yet been accepted and processed'.

If the truth was that then it's more accurate to say that "dogs are scary" is a prejudice, not a judgement. Judging is discerning, there's no reason to say that discernment always involves some kind of denial or that they have us thinking apples are oranges. Prejudices and bias on the other hand may very well describe what you said.

Humans should develop within themselves the power to judge over good and evil and to correctly perceive all things, so that they may be wise and fair and follow the laws.

Posted using Partiko Android

For me, judgement is not discernment. Discernment leaves space open for change - whereas judgements are outside of time and continue to have a lasting effect in self long after they are formed. Discernment notices the differences in things, whereas judgement has a blanket quality that denies details in favor of quick (and typically false) conclusions.

I've just pointed out that prejudice and bias is more accurate for the example you gave, do you not agree? Now the question is why do you see a difference between discernment and judgement? It's as if you have a prejudice against the word itself, because discernment and judgement are interchangeable and describe the very same act.

Posted using Partiko Android

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 67685.37
ETH 3498.92
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.71