A study of mesopelagic fish found that 73 % of them had plastic in their gut!
We hear a lot about how much plastic there is in our oceans, with the craziest examples being the Great Pacific garbage patch that have often been known as “plastic islands”. It is not quite an island, but there is still a very high density of plastic particles in this area, which goes to show that the plastic we throw in the ocean ends up causing havoc on ecosystems somewhere.
A lot of plastic wash up on the beaches, but even more get eaten by fish, or just travels with the currents in the ocean. Image is Public Domain.
Today I want to talk a bit about a new study that looked at the plastic content of mesopelagic fish. A mesopelagic fish simply means that it is a fish that feeds in the mesopelagic zone, which is roughly 200 to 1,000 meters below the ocean surface.
We don't really know a whole lot about many of the species that live in this zone, but what we do know is that they are all adapted to a pretty unchanging environment with little light.
Why mesopelagic fish
Mesopelagic fish are interesting to look at for a couple of reasons. Firstly they are abundant, so there are many different species as well as many species with large populations. Secondly they are important for the transport of carbon and nutrients from the upper part of the ocean to the deep sea. Because of this we also assume that they are responsible for a lot of transportation of plastic from the ocean top to the deep sea.
This happens because the mesopelagic fish often travels up high during the day to feed on fish, and can eat fish that are not really able to travel further down into the ocean depths. The mesopelagic fish on the other hand tends to have a big vertical movement, and some species even dive really deep during the night to hide. So by doing this they have a vertical transportation of nutrients, and most likely also plastic.
Finding plastic in 3/4th of all mesopelagic fish
The research team consisted of scientists from National University of Ireland Galway, and they caught a total of 233 fish in the Northwest Atlantic, about 1,200 kilometers west from Newfoundland. All fish were caught from the depths of 300-600 meters, and consisted of fish from 7 different species.
The results show that almost three quarters of the fish the examined has plastic in their gut! Out of some of the samples species, such as Gonostoma denudatum that had plastic in every single sampled fish.
They also found that stomach fullness, and the depth at which fish were caught at did not affect the amount of plastic in their stomach, and the plastic found was similar to the plastic found at surface levels.
How does the plastic end up in the ocean?
The big questions when we are talking about plastic in the oceans is how it ends up there, and the short answer is that it is carried by rivers to the ocean. Pretty much all plastic that is not recycled ends up in the ocean at one point. Just imagine throwing a piece of plastic into a garbage can that is already pretty full; the plastic might fall out. After this point it will eventually get carried away by the wind, and might end up in a river which carries it downstream. At one point it will most likely reach the ocean, so a lot of plastic that is thrown away in cities and in garbage bins end up in the ocean after a while.
A study has even found out that over 95 % of the plastic in the ocean originates from only 10 rivers! These are all big rivers that flows through countries with poor inhabitants, where they generally focus less on recycling. 8 of the rivers are in Asia, with the two remaining ones in Africa.
River Niger, one of the ten rivers that are responsible for 95 % of the ocean plastic pollution. Image by Guaka, posted with the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Some of the most common types of plastic that cause havoc in the ocean ecosystems are things such as grocery bags, plastic bottles used for soda, and plastic packaging used for food items and snacks. These are of course too large to be eaten by most fish, but they get gradually worn down by solar radiation and mechanical stress as they are carried along the currents in the ocean. Once they reach a small size they will be eaten by the fish, and get stuck in their stomach.
The plastic have long-term effect on the ecosystem
One might expect that the bad cycle of plastic ends when the fish has died from the plastic content in its gut, but the truth is that the cycle continues, and the plastic affect the entire marine ecosystem. If the fish dies a natural death it will sink to the ocean floor where the plastic will either be gradually turned to sediment, or be eaten by new species down in the depths.
Other problems arise when sea birds eat a lot of fish that has plastic in their gut, and just take a look at the image below of an albatross with its entire stomach filled with plastic!
Not much room for food here! Image by Chris Jordan, posted as Public Domain.
Getting a stomach filled with plastic is a big problem for piscivores (animals that primarily eat fish), such as many species of whales and sea birds. There have been many documented cases of both these groups of animals actually dying because of a too high plastic content in their stomach, leaving no room for real, digestible food.
We need to recycle plastic
If we want to stop this, the only solution is to recycle the plastic we use! Obviously it would be a lot better if companies started to use other types of packaging for their products, but it is generally more expensive and less durable, so that’s why they go for the easy choice and make plastic packaging.
Anyone, every single one of us is responsible for plastic pollution, even those of us who try our best to not do this. It's very easy to pollute with plastic even without meaning to, and just think about how many animals that can be saved if we all work together to reduce our usage of plastic, and become better at recycling it!
Thanks for reading
Thanks for reading about the plastic found in mesopelagic fish. I guess it’s not really a surprising study, but it goes a long way to show that even fish that live at several hundred meters depths get affected by our pollution.
PS. Sorry that I have not answered most comments and replies in the last few days; I’ve been a bit more busy than expected. But don’t worry, I’ll get back to it soon, and everyone will get their upvotes and replies :)
About @valth
Hey, I'm @valth - the author of this post. I love to write about nature, biology, animals, nature conservation, ecology and other related branches of science, and I occasionally write about my life, about Steem or about random stuff as well. I'm trying my best to write at least one post every day, so make sure to give me a follow if you enjoy my content and want to see more of it.
Join the @valth community!
I love nothing more than to engage with my readers, so please join the @valth community in the comment section. You will definitely find more information about the topic, personal experiences, questions, and even opposing views down there, so don't miss out on learning more.
I always reward users who post good comments, so please take the opportunity to share your views and get a small upvote in exchange for it.
again, very good, informative and IMPORTANT article! thank you so much! it is frustrating that the topic of recycling is still neglected is that many countries. Sure, there is a huge problem of hunger and one may argue that it's much more significant. But the awareness in the developing countries must be raised! on the other hand i have friends who do not pay too much attention to recycling:( in 21st century! i am always like a bad cop, try to educate and make them more "sensible". but i see they get tired of my "blablabla". It's like with smoking i guess.. if you don't want to quit yourself, you will continue although you have heard million reasons of why it is not good for your health.
Thanks for the kind words and great comment, @k-a-s-i-a, and sorry for not replying sooner.
I don't see why we should not try to solve this problem, just because these are other (worse) problems. The thing is that these are also kind of interconnected; more plastic waste will lead to problems for certain fish populations, which will reduce the available fish, and in turn might even lead to more people starving. This is a big, global problem that we all need to address!
It's great to hear that you are trying to get people to do the right thing, but I share your experience of the people that won't really listen or care about it. It's perfectly normal to have cognitive dissonance with your own bad behavior, so I guess that is one of the things that could explain it, but we should not let this stop us from trying to educate people on the matter :)
Being A SteemStem Member
Thank you :)
Even with recycling, one of the issues is with the little plastic bits used as feedstock for manufacturing. These are called 'nurdles' and, as you might imagine for a tiny & light thing, it is easy for them to accidentally enter the environment. They are a significant part of plastic pollution.
Between nurdles and, frankly, the impossibility of getting everyone to recycle, more must be done. As you pointed out, expense and durability of non-plastics are issues, but biodegradable plastics are an increasingly promising option. BUT it's important for us as consumers to know not all degradable plastics are the same with respect to how they degrade.
Going roughly from worst to best (terminology my own, as the industry standards are in flux):
Disintegratable These are generally the plastics we're used to, but with weak points inserted throughout the polymer. This can be things like starch or UV reactive compounds. They certainly do break into smaller and smaller pieces, but generally the degree of substitution is not sufficient to produce small enough fragments to actually biodegrade. What you actually get are millions of microscopic bits of plastic. Note that the UV sensitive plastic will not degrade while in sediment, underwater, or in a fish.
Compostable/Oxobiodegradable In some cases, these are similar disintegratable plastics, but with a different degradable substitution. In other cases, these are different polymers from traditional plastics. However, in both situations there is an added requirement that oxygen is present for degradation to occur. Often the assumption is lots of oxygen, and increased temperature. This is why plastics which are technically compostable are really only meant to be composted at the industrial scale and may never break down in someone's backyard pile. As you can imagine, they have many of the same issues as disintegratable plastics with respect to oceanic pollution.
Biodegradable These truly mineralize (become CO2, energy, and biomass) over time under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. They are almost all alternative polymers (although some are not new just not as popular as PE and PS, like polycaprolactone(PCA) and polyvinyal acetate). Unfortunately they are also, unfortunately, moreexpensive to produce, due to both the price of feedstock and the fact that we have tons of infrastructure already set up for traditional polymers. Beyond that, many don't have quite the same material properties, PCA, for example, can't replace plastic coffee cups because of its low melting point.
Hi, @effofex. Firstly, sorry for the late reply! I try my best to answer all comments on my post a lot earlier than this, but sometimes that's not possible. Sorry!
Anyway, it's great that you mention nurdles, and as you say, these are a very big problem. It's really interesting to see how many of these you find on beaches when you are looking for them - cause they are everywhere! So many small pieces we assume is sand is in fact one of these nurdles.
Thanks for making such a great list of the different type of plastic options that are available. It seems to be that the only real solution is to use the biodegradable version, but of course they have major drawbacks in form of being more expensive. I believe that we who live in somewhat rich countries should at least step up as a good example and invest more into using this type of plastic, while also working on educating the poorer people about recycling.
Again, thanks for a great comment!
No worries on the reply, I'm glad your internet seems more stable lately.
I'm glad you liked the comment.
I think the problem might have been fixed now, so it's back to being more responsive again :)
Being A SteemStem Member
You received a 10.0% upvote since you are not yet a member of geopolis and wrote in the category of "ecology".
To read more about us and what we do, click here.
https://steemit.com/geopolis/@geopolis/geopolis-the-community-for-global-sciences-update-4
If you do not want us to upvote and comment on your posts concerning earth and earth sciences, please reply stop to this comment and we will no longer bother you with our love ❤️
Thank you! :)
It is so disheartening when I see pictures and read stories such as the ones you have shared. Plastic does not go away and it is a shame humans are so irresponsible with their garbage. The bottom line is that it seems many people are lazy and apathetic. I always take reusable bags to market for my groceries. I am usually the only one with everyone else using those wretched plastic bags.
It takes little effort to remember the bags and I really have a hard time understanding why everyone still uses plastic...it is wasteful. It is no mystery what plastic does to the environment, its inhabitants and our ecosystems...I feel like they have taught us from a young age...still people make no effort to improve the situation.
Every little bit helps and it all adds up. We can not make people care but we can still educate and lead by example. When I go on hikes with my nieces and nephews, I pick up trash others have left behind on the trail. The young eyes see this and I hope it resonates with them throughout adulthood. The children are the future and introducing them to environmentally conscience habits now will hopefully produce environmentally conscience adults.
Great article and insight! Thanks for sharing @valth !
Thanks for your comment!
I personally try to do my best with not wasting plastic, but I stumbled onto a pretty stupid problem when I tried to use only reusable bags; I needed to buy other plastic bags to throw my garbage away. I couldn't even find any biodegradable plastic bags that was the correct size, so I am kind of stuck to using plastic grocery bags.. So the only thing I can do is to try my best to not get any more then I need, and rather use a reusable bag if I end up with too many plastic bags at one point. I find this system to be pretty stupid, but hopefully we will be able to use more environmental-friendly options in the future.
That's great! I think small things like this can really shape how they care for the environment and nature itself when they grow up, so I'm all for educating the children with these issues. I believe one of the major reasons why I'm really advocating a more sustainable future has a lot to do with the fact that I grew up during a time where all children were urged to do beach cleanings, learn about the problems of pollution etc.
Again, thanks for a great comment, @kiristin!
I too have that problem. You would think they would make biodegradable garbage bags. I have my fair share of plastic bags and reuse them for instances like smaller trash bags, cat litter box cleaning and dog waste when walking. It is not perfect but reusing them makes it not so wasteful, I think.
This rings true with me. My parents always picked up others trash when we would go on outdoor outings, my dad would take me to the recycling facility with his cans and then give me the money from his cans. At five years knowing I could get money for recycling meant a lot LOL.
Yeah, that sounds reasonable. If everyone was doing this, we would certainly be able to reduce the overall plastic production, so this is a good habit to have!
That's a nice story! I think the incentive to return cans and get paid a little bit for it can be very nice for children, but it could also lead them to think along the lines of not caring about returning the non-paid waste. But I definitely think it has a net benefit.
So sad story that 95 percent of ocean plastic pollution created by only 10 river majority of them (80 percent) belongs to Asia. It is due to poor inhabitant, no public awareness, corruption, no enforcement of laws. The situation will be worst if we cannot take emergency measures to cope up plastic pollution problem. The best thing to cope up with this issue is to provide awareness to maximum people. Even if we steemians make promise with ourself to give awareness to our surroundings it will be very beneficial to reduce plastic pollution to great extent. Thanks for sharing
I completely agree. I personally think that a lot of this plastic would be stopped from entering the ocean if we do three things:
1) educate the people close to these ten rivers about the problems with plastic pollution,
2) get the governments to implement good recycling problems, and
3) get plastic recycling plants set up close to the end of these rivers to catch and collect a lot of the plastic that flows in the river.
Yes, this is something we all can improve on, even those of us who are already trying to do our best (because we can always do a bit better) :)
Awareness/education of plastic pollution and it's bad consequences is mandatory to both community i.e local community + tourist. Recycling plants near to the river is also a great idea. In addition govt can hire native staff members to clean the shore area. It will serve in two way. Local community will earn for providing services and at the same time help to minimize plastic pollution.
Yeah, I think this would be a great solution. It's too bad that the countries close to these big rivers are typically very poor, and the governments there are unlikely too care a lot about pollution..
@valth
So it can be surmised from this that the reason these mesopelagic fish have high contents of plastic is due to the fact the migrate closer to the surface to feed on fish presumably which are consuming smaller fish which are more intensely feeding in or around the plastic waste.
Can you tell me whether or not there was any deep water analysis done to calculate if any contamination from the plastic reaching down that far or is the plastic contamination localised to the upper levels of the ocean?
Yes, I would say so.
I'm pretty sure this research was based on the mesopelagic fish eating fish that would live closer to the surface. While plastic can sometimes end up "free floating" in the water column, it tends to either stay close to the surface or sink to the bottom. It all depends on the density of the water and the plastic.
Yikes, after seeing the gut from that albatross, I wondered how terrible the inside of a whale would have looked. I knew that plastic could have been an initial choking hazard to some animals, but I never even considered the fact that birds, bigger fish, and larger animals in general are probably full of non-biodegradable junk. It' scary to consider how much there is already out there and that some stuff can't even be effectively be re-cylced.
Let me tell you, those whales do not look good at all.. We had a "plastic whale" beach stranding here in Norway a year ago, and it was on obvious pain, so it was put down. When dissected, they found 30 plastic bags in its stomach. I'm not completely sure which species of whale it was, but it was about 6 meters long.
You can see pictures in this article by the Norwegian newspaper NRK is you are interested.
After first reading this post, the word that came to mind was "disheartening". However, I quickly got to what can we do about it? How can we prevent this altogether? I think a greater focus on incentivizing the recycling of all plastics, specially in regions with the greatest plastic footprint could substantially improve this form of pollution. Thank you for sharing this fantastic post and bringing light to this crucial topic.
I agree with you, and I think education the polluters and incentivize them to recycle is a very good start. As you might imagine, most of the plastic pollution comes from poorer countries where they have less education about the dangers of polluting. So we can probably reach pretty far just by education alone.
I agree with you in stating "we can probably reach pretty far by education alone". Teaching the generations to come the importance of being aware of the effects our actions have on the environment will be monumental in creating actual change.
Yeah, exactly. It should be mandatory to cover a lot of the problems with pollution in school in my opinion :) It would do a lot of good!
Absolutely! Specially considering teaching kids to have a greater proactive role in environmental issues such as this will only empower them;0)