RE: A Geeky Guy's Movie Guide to Dunkirk
Saw this movie a couple days ago and I agree with a lot of what you said. I hadn't even realized until you mentioned it that I didn't know a single character's name except for George throughout the film. I think I went in expecting a closer resemblance to "Saving Private Ryan" and was severely disappointed in comparison to that movie. I expected to grow with the characters and feel their emotions, but that was not what this movie was about. (That was 100% on me for expecting something the movie wasn't).
I did enjoy how the three stories intersected, but I thought they could have culminated with a little more drama. It felt somewhat forced in terms of the connection between the story-lines.
One thing that I noticed though was that the pilots speak in terms of gallons of fuel as opposed to liters like I would expect for a British group. Is that simply an oversight, a historical accuracy (potentially American built planes?), or a way to connect with an American audience better?
In the UK we use a mixture of metric and imperial units. It's not uncommon for older people to use gallons, although most young people use litres.
Oh very interesting! Thank you for the response. It was just a little thing I picked out and was confused about for the whole movie.