The first half of this article is great, but I think the last part of the article is build upon Jump To Conclusion fallacy, making me believe that I will see this in the GRE Analytic Writing's argument section in the future.

"""Unlike their traditional counterparts, ATM devices dealing with cryptocurrency can not be exploited so easily. (WHY?) The software on the devices is much more secure compared to what banks have to offer. (WHY MUCH SECURE?) Since there are no card slots involved it is all but impossible to make unauthorized purchases or withdrawals. (What happened in Taiwan did not involve card slots as well. How may you draw the conclusion that no-card-slots results in a more safe nature?) """

Alright, I am getting too serious...