The only problem in this article is Algo score. How is it calculated, based on what?
If you compare for example BTG vs FSN or ZIL ...... who gave BTG score of 4.3 vs 3.5(FSN) or 3.9(ZIL). Absolutely insane!
BTG has been dead for 4 months , dropped from $220 in mid January to just a bit over $50 . On the other hand FSN and ZIl gained 300%-ish since the bottom on April 1. , two coins with the potential for this year of at least 30x.
I am not saying that BRD is a bad project or that it cannot surpass ETH but the algo score is something that I do not rely on, simply forget about it, use common sense ......
" If you want more info on how coincheck comes up with these scores please take a moment to go check each of the full reports here: BRD Or ETHOS "
Thanks for your reply, And for taking the time to look at the post in detail.. I linked to the full reports of each and it explains in detail how its calculated for each project, Each section has not only a score but a why that explains how it got scored that way.. I agree I don't just look at coincheckup score and call it a good investment either. I do my own research into things i like. I do however like how in depth into each project the scoring goes. They cant take into account the human and hype factors.. Its just scoring based on the set social and project fundamentals.
Their score system sucks my friend. I just gave you one example why, can give you more coins that are far better investments than BTG.
Do not base your investment strategy on some algos ......... that`s insane.