You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Doug Casey and I Destroying Commies On Universal Income
It's immoral to turn the earth into a casino and create every manner of unmerited wealth!
It's immoral to turn the earth into a casino and create every manner of unmerited wealth!
And who will decide whose wealth was unmerited? You? Earning UBI without doing any work seems pretty unmerited. I wish manna could really rain down from the heavens, but that is not how it works. Wealth must be first produced before it can be consumed. People's freedom to spontaneously work and trade has been the biggest help to those in poverty, than any planned system.
Which casino do you own? Which mafia oligarch do you type for?
And why not me and billions of others like me who are fed up with the billionaire class and their extortions and usury and using every foul type of unnecessary exploitation and coercion to gain unfair advantage over their fellow man, women and child.
You bet a reckoning is upon us for those who espouse the plundering of the earth and its peoples!
My username is literally End Plunder. It's just that I know it is Government who plunders. And it is government who extorts us and who awards unfair advantages to special interests and companies, that they otherwise do not have in a free market.
The UBI requires theft to be funded and relies on legal tender laws to ensure their payments are usable. Both are damaging to our freedom.
it's not just guvment that plunders us; it's a toxic corporate model, and a usurous fiat/fractional system. We should have had the ability to address these corruptions but the fiat masters and corporations purchased guvment in the last 100 years. This has created imbalanced power relations and it again, is not guvment per se that is the problem. Within an anarchist society there would still need to be laws and there are laws that we all must follow ( the laws of thermodynamics/aka entropic systems) , but it would still need some type of government; but it would need to be a government which hasn't capitulated to corrupt power relations.
And BTW: Trump is the exact opposite of one who could solve these complex issues; but true, neither was O'bomber, as they both serve the fiat masters and their corporate model.
Okay we agree on: fractional banking being bad and crony govt'granted priveleges to biz as also bad?
So if it weren't for special interests, the government would be ran by benevolent do-gooders?
If the natural tendency of man is so bad that it is not safe for people to control their own lives, how is it that mwmbers of government are always good? Are they not just people with self interest too? Or are they angels?
Okay, good! We agree on two primary problems and are partly agreed on the government, although I understand your position to mean absolutely no form of government. I've pointed out that I considrer this position a strawman as it's not inevtible that government has to be toxic. But these are called intractable problems and they are difficult to solve especially when a huge part of this corruption is the corruption of the law and courts.
That aside, consider this: it's estimated by scholars that about 2 in 10 people are prone to being sociopathic and psychopathic and that this demographic seeks power and perverts power relationships. Given that fact, how would you go about keeping The Negans (The Walking Dead) from toxifying the public sphere?
And BTW: to my thinking this is exactly what has happened--the mafia won in the past century and controls almost every manner of business.
I dont know if 20% of people are insane. But i know how to keep them from toxifying the public sphere : Keep them out of government! Don't vote for them and don't support government organization. If the laws and courts are corrupt - privitize them.
Negan is a lot like the federal government; he wants your guns and half your income. His loyalists patriotism reminds of the blind faith that people put into all organizations that promise to keep you safe while actually victimizing you. They were all capable of choosing cooperation but they chose instead coercive theft. I guess it's the appeal of easy money. They are just bandits. Rick is right to deny their claim to his property.