That link is to an article by a guy saying he did a search of NED1 but if you look at his ACTUAL search query down toward the end of that article, you can see it looks like he may have mistakenly included "object type = ANY" (ot_include=ANY).
And as I said the first time you asked mr. snippypants :-) I (dis)agree with some scientists some of the time depending upon what makes sense to me.