You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 0.5 STEEM PRIZE: Explain this MEME
From the Washington Examiner:
"When Wen speaks of vulnerable individuals, she means men and woman who can presumably walk and talk and live without their life being snuffed out without warning — little children at risk of being ripped and vacuumed from the safety and security of the womb."
" This distinction doesn’t make it into the slick video. But plenty of healthy and happy babies and toddlers do — survivors of the Roe era. The images make it seem as if Planned Parenthood was in the business of giving life instead of taking it. But the lens flares and the dramatic music and the eloquent cadence of Wen’s words can’t hide that her organization ends the lives of more than 320,000 unborn children annually."
Couldn't have said it any better. I watched the "slick" video, lens flares and all, and I was disgusted by the smug false righteousness and pride displayed in this concept they've invented called "woman's health". They have to rebrand their service to make it palatable for general consumption. Woman's health? Really? How about the psychological damage to woman's health after committing infanticide inside her body?
Um..yeah they don't talk about that!