Is Society Wanting Public Execution?

Tom R. Tyler says that in the Why People Obey the Law, if a person feels that a judicial procedure protects their dignity and that a fair trial takes place, the judge will be pleased even if he makes a disadvantage against him. I want to express that I should treat people as heroes. Most people do not know about the judicial process. It is difficult to maintain self - esteem in a situation where only doing what is done in the judicial process, and giving a mechanical answer to a mechanical question and scaring it. In addition, leaving everything to the lawyer makes people more depressed. In that situation, the ruling, what I could not do, and the ruling of the judge who disregarded me, would it be possible to convince the ruling?

Moreover, when the audience, the public, is pouring out words against me, will anybody adapt to the verdict? If what we want is a rehabilitation of the criminals and justice, we must save our anger. Save your anger and keep the dignity of the criminals. If you just want to do whatever you want to do, project it to the criminals of all your stains, and if you want to pour out all the rage and get better, be executed.

Execute as brutally as possible and be satisfied. If you are not willing to give yourself a chance to live as a dignified citizen once you have paid the penalty, introduce torture and public execution instead of a ridiculous resocialization program.

Similar things happen in hospitals. A mechanical procedure that ignores patients, a procedure where I have to go, why I have to go, and what treatments I get and what prescriptions I get. In the procedure, the patient goes down in self-esteem. Satisfaction is also reduced. It affects not only the hospital but also the satisfaction of life. My dignity, which respects the doctor, and a little self-esteem there, greatly increases the quality of life. Man is a very delicate animal. I do not mean to criticize the current doctors, and I hope you do not get me wrong. It is a matter of mutual respect. A doctor is a profession that suffers from heavy labor, jealousy of people's time and jealousy. How can you protect your self-esteem from being able to keep your self-esteem from your doctor? The whole culture of our culture must change.

The government's response to cryptography and the public's response are the same. The government that drives all cryptographic investors to gambling addicts, and the public who pour constant criticism on cryptographic investors. The rumor that investors are pouting is a horrible thing to come down to. What harmonization is possible in this? Clearly, harmony is necessary. Unless it is a radical anarchist, most investors agree on the need to incorporate the institutional rights. How many will oppose the intention of finding a fraudulent exchange and providing a safe environment for investors and preventing criminal offenses? So expression is always important. A story that is unfavorable to an opponent turns into a word that can be understood only by a slight color adjustment.

Finally, let's look at what happened in the KR community recently. Was the community wanting harmony and consensus, or public execution? The endless ridicule that they poured on them, could you bear it? When they came to action, they were accused again that they had been tortured. Could you have accepted the accusation as a natural punishment by sin? Considering that their sin is a very vague reality, it is also a blame for innocent. The community is not innocent if their guilt is a closed voting pool. Their sins are equally in the community. A sinner is an act of insulting a sinner. Stimicans who insult them may not have a closed pool of boots.

Yes, let's say that. The same is true. If you were to commit them to a closed voting pool, it would be fair for community members to form a closed pool of voting. How should they act in the judges who are not fair and do not keep dignity?

According to Tom R. Tyler, they have no reason to follow the law.

Thanks for reading,

Feel free to share your thoughts :D