I will be opening conversation up in the next few months on being able to flag someone and out-weighing their voters up votes therefore shading their content out.

It's a conversation that needs to happen. But it's not just about the flags, there are so many voting issues that until you are effected by them or do a little research you just don't understand how bad they are. But the current system needs some work.

I was looking for your last post as I have you on autovote and didn't notice it in my feed. The shading out made me pass right over it I think.

Anyways hope that was a 1 time deal and this time around you don't run into that. We don't need to be censoring out someone that is giving back to the people in real life when there are spammers and self proclaimed experts everywhere on this platform raking in serious money.

Sad to see you are stopping the Direct to Vendor program...it was a great one! If you ever start back up you will have my support again.

Will take a look at what @pattayaonline is doing and see if it's worth not only supporting but referring others to as I did the Direct to Vendor program.

Now I should probably put in a really obnoxious animated gif or stolen pictures from the internet to get your attention like all the spammers...what do you think? I have started downvoting all of those if they appear on my Pay It Forward Curation Contest posts. I ask nicely to delete the image and if not gone in 24 hours it gets a flag. Amazing how much easier it is to read comments without those in there. Had 244 comments on last weeks contest and need to be able to scan all the comments to keep finding the new entries.