As it were, legal audits are a test to the manner by which a choice has been made, as opposed to the rights and wrongs of the conclusion came to.

It isn't generally worried about the finishes of that procedure and whether those were 'ideal', as long as the correct methodology have been taken after. The court won't substitute what it supposes is the 'right' choice.

This may imply that general society body will have the capacity to settle on a similar choice once more, inasmuch as it does as such legally.