Abstract:

A & B's caveat still applies - this is first-person inference only; commentary & critique is welcome (I'm nearly certain it is the only method of affirmation).

To more easily understand what I am attempting to convey, I refine Kant's deontological 'Categorical Imperative' to have synonymous meaning to 'Crux' - I hope he wouldn't have minded too much. ;)

Crux:  a vital, basic, decisive, or pivotal point:

The crux of the trial was his whereabouts at the time of the murder.

Synonyms:  essence, heart, core, gist. 

(Source)

Categorical Imperatives [CI] necessitate

Evolving Contingency Plans (ECP)s.

Sub-Axiom :

What is beyond imagination is not necessarily beyond manifestation.

1. (ECP)s are adaptive and autonomous.  
2. [CI]s are composed of necessary conditions.  
   1. [CI]s distribute objects into subjects  
   2. [CI]s distribute subjects into (ECP)s  
3. (ECP)s are defined by necessary content properties.  
4. Necessary content properties are categorical conditions. (CC)  
5. (CC)s are not always [CI]s.  
   1. Conditions are not necessarily imperatives.  
   2. Imperatives are (CC).  
6. (CC)s evolve as necessary with [CI)s  
7. [CI]s will evolve necessarily.   

Coincidentally 7?