Dear Stephen Hawking...

in #life7 years ago (edited)
Harald Lesch is a German astrophysicist, philosopher, science journalist, TV host and university professor. He teaches physics at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich and philosophy at the Munich University of Philosophy.

This video is a reply to Stephen Hawking's latest statement, from one of Germany's most reputable scientists and philosophers.

Let me translate:

The most popular scientist of the world has now laid it on the line. He said the world will come to an end and we have to go to Mars within 100 years, all of us!

There, said it. Stephen Hawking spoke out. In 100 years it will happen. And to prevent our own extinction, we must go to Mars.

Is this doable? Can we engineer Mars to be something that would support human life? So that we can go on from there? Within 100 years? Is this realistic? I mean, the warnings about the fact, that humans are putting themselves in danger, suicide so to say, are very common. It's about climate change and conflicts, big conflicts, about the atomic holocaust we are on the verge of, again and again. Once the superpowers on the planet come too close together, with all their armed forces... and so on. I see it clearly. This is the potential to devastate the entire human race. Even in less than 100 years, actually every day.

But how do we get away from this? So, we have to make sure that these kind of conflicts won't happen and we also have to do the right thing, according to common sense. To save the environment, transition to renewable energy, desalinate sea water, more renewables and justness for everyone, and so on. Anyway...

We know exactly what we have to do here on earth.

I look over at Mars, wondering. What can we do over there? Mars is nowadays, and we know that for sure... We were there a few times. Well, not us but our machines and... It's a desert! An unparalleled desert! And yes, indeed, they say there is water but it's totally oversalted. And if at all then it is somewhere beneath the surface. Why, you ask? Well, it's because there is no atmosphere on Mars and Mars is only a tenth of earth's mass and we won't be able to change this. But no matter how we possibly could create an atmosphere on Mars, and we need one with oxygen, the question would still be: How long will it stay? Mars has no magnetic field. The solar flares would tear this atmosphere apart. And then gravity is so weak on Mars, that the gases in the atmosphere tend to dissipate anyway. And that's why we can't find any water on the surface of Mars. Because it just evaporates immediately.

But well, ok, let's simply assume that we would be able to sustain an atmosphere on Mars. What would that be like? Well, Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos, surrounding Mars all the time and there is no atmosphere. If there would be one, what will happen? Do you know? Exactly, you're right! They will loose speed and then crash into Mars! And the surface of Mars is uninhabitable for another 10,000 years, at least.

And therefore, dear Stephen Hawking...

...it is problematic to combine an absolute valid warning with a recommendation, that is nothing but utter bollocks! Mars is not an option! Even with the help of the most advanced technologies humans may come up with, it will take many tens of thousands of years to make Mars inhabitable. It took planet earth millions of years to support life or just even have rain. So to put it briefly, all this geo-engineering of whole planets... It takes a while. This is no option for the near future. No quick rescue.

So, let me summarize. I'll call it...

The Olympic Challenges

Climate change, energy transformation, resource scarcity, demographic trends and immigration, these are all centered around global equity. These are the great challenges we're facing. And we have to solve them here on earth. ASAP! We must not go extinct!

And this little sphere called Mars won't help us. Who knows if we'll ever get there, definitely not anytime soon. But there is another sphere, which is way more important. It is our brains, common sense, reason, sanity.
This is what we need to focus on to solve all these problems. And we totally can! We just have to actually, finally set off... and not towards Mars but... to find ourselves again.

Harald Lesch


Time Magazine: Stephen Hawking Says Humans Have 100 Years to Move to Another Planet


Thank you for your attention!


Follow for more on
Technology/Science/Future
Nature/Environment/Sustainability
Society/Ethics/Philosophy
Art/Music/Fun

Read about me and my content.

Sort:  

This is an excellent, timely article. I can't imagine how much work it must have taken to translate. I will resteem later today so more people can see it.

I would give it 2 votes if I could!

Wow, thank you very much! I'd really appreciate a resteem. Would be the first time ever that my content gets resteemed. :D (well, actually the second time, thanks to @steemhelper)

And yes, it took some time to translate it. Although it is not translated word by word as some german expressions don't make sense in english but I tried to find the best fitting translations, which actually was the difficult part. I didn't measure the time but it was at least 2 hours, maybe 3.

Tanks again! :)

Ooops. Forgot to resteem last night, just did it now.

I'm a native English speaker, and I had to transcribe part of a video that was in English, and it was difficult, and tedious, and I was very proud of myself once completed. And I didn't time it, but it must have taken me an hour to transcribe the speech. My hat's off to you.

If it doesn't offend you, can I offer you a little correction? I noticed that when you used the word "Mars", sometimes you did not capitalize it. I'm sure it was an oversight. This is sent with warm thoughts, OK?

I wish you the best, and it's a pleasure to meet you.

Corrections are very appreciated! I updated the post. Thank you. :)

Say once more, why we will extinct on the Earth in 100 years??

He has theorized in the past that the chance of a disaster on Earth adds up over time, so that it's a "near certainty" in the next 1,000 or 10,000 years, but the human race will survive if it expands into outer space.
http://www.time.com/4767595/stephen-hawking-100-years-new-planet/

Professor Stephen Hawking thinks the human species will have to populate a new planet within 100 years if it is to survive. With climate change, overdue asteroid strikes, epidemics and population growth, our own planet is increasingly precarious.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/mediapacks/tomorrows-world/television

Maybe he's a little bit overdramatizing... I don't know.

Aha, ok, so in general he thinks that we are about to be hit by a giant rock because we weren't hit recently.
How optimistic. LOL

Stochastics... :D

Oh and I'm a little bit curious... what led you to this 2 month old post of mine?

I guess the mention of the human extinction and Mars.

Your article has been re-steemed and upvoted by @steemhelper , great article! Keep up writing quality content like this.
do you also want to get your great content resteemed if it is good enough? Check the link below:
https://steemit.com/whale/@steemhelper/introducing-worlds-first-re-steem-whale-how-can-it-benefit-the-steemit-community-how-can-steemians-profit-from-it
Please recommend this initiative to your friends.

Thaaank you very much! :)

He is used by someone to push scientific agenda
I posted this around a week ago:
https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@vox00/stephen-hawking-sad-truth
Stephen is replaced few times during his life probably

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.24
TRX 0.26
JST 0.041
BTC 98556.18
ETH 3491.32
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.37