Chess teaches us many things of a crucial value, but the best ones are that "without the appropriate timing the best game will be probably lost" and that "we as humans will always improve not on our wins but our defeats and mistakes"... In this sense, probably Energy can't be created for we assume that it is always transformed, and it can't be destroyed, but if we lose and gain energy in transformation, isn't it destruction and rebirth of the same? How about the fact that we as humans need measurable and "touchable" things and only a few can understand that Singularity not only exists but we live it at the point that our social conditions are "layered" and the infinite value of space–time matter is infinitely more reliable on our individual input as we can even be living into the centre of a black hole without realizing it, augmenting or reducing our own weight which can be in both cases contradictory to what "was meant" as a physical equation... Physics and mathematics, like everything we have today, are products of "human guess," and even when those prove to happen as predicted or recalculated, how is it possible to challenge assertions when assertions are everything, none, and the whole... You won't probably find the relation, but referring to the "paradoxical state," words will be limited until humanity does not unify all languages and people come together into one state. If it was simple, "I love you" would be sufficient to keep a family together, and we all know that it is not, and as evolution advances, it might never be again... ∜mp