Bitcoin Segwit2X @ 88.2%, let's hope they checked the code. A small write up for users new to crypto.
Lots of interesting things going on with Bitcoin at the moment. Because I realize not everyone on Steemit is into crypto. I'll try to make this write-up as easy to understand as I can.
The block size for Bitcoin has been a problem for a while. It's not big enough (1MB) to fit in all the transactions that users want to make.
Therefore there is a huge backlog of transactions waiting for a block increasing the transaction times. Making the whole system slow.
(You can compare it to a train station where a train arrives every 10 minutes and has not enough wagons for all the passengers to get in. But new passengers are arriving all the time. Before you know it you have a line outside the station.)
For miners, this is actually great news because now users need to add a big fee with their transaction to get in front of the line and get their transaction go through. It's a good extra source of income for miners but bad for users.
It's been tried before to increase the block size but consensus could never be found. Therefore we are still stuck with 1MB blocks.
Some users got so sick of this they decided to take matters into their own hand. They want to force a decision by implementing a UASF (User activated soft fork).
What they will do is basically only accept blocks from miners that signal with their mined blocks that they support Segwit. Segwit is the term used for a block size increase. Blocks from miners that don't signal support for Segwit will be ignored. This UASF will happen August 1st.
source: coindesk.com
This UASF made Miners and Bitcoin companies a little bit scared. So they agreed to meet in New York to talk about it. They decided to implement Segwit on their own terms so they came up with Segwit2X and they want to implement it before August 1st. Preventing all that UASF Stuff and god knows what all those users might come up with.
The current support for Segwit2X is 88.2% amongst miners. If the support is higher than 80% on July 21st. It will lock in and activate 2 weeks later.
3 months after that it will be hard-forked into the blockchain on November 1st. With hopefully 100% miner support.
Scenarios and opinions
Everybody has an opinion about what is right and wrong with Bitcoin at the moment. Some say Bitcoin should never increase it's block size and should become a store of value instead of a usable coin for small transactions. They say that even with 2MB blocks it's still so outdated. (10 minutes transaction time vs 3 seconds with STEEM for instance).
But it's also the most popular crypto and if users and companies have to work with it, it would be beneficial for the whole crypto space if it at least works without delay.
My personal biggest fear about this whole Segwit2x is that if it fails we will end up with 2 different Bitcoins (or more). It will cause major confusion in the markets about which is the real one. I'm also not too happy about the rush at wich this Segwit2x is being implemented because of the UASF fears.
I hope they checked the code.
Interesting times ahead! That's forsure.
Follow Me @exyle
Bitcoin SwC Poker, download and use affiliate code: Blazin8888
I fail to find a good source where I can see what the support for segwit2x is. Can you link me a good source?
Here: https://coin.dance/blocks
Bookmarked. Thanks!
Good post !!
Just learn and few things from your post.
Leave it at 1mb, it will be like a way for bitcoin to store value.
Increase it will make bitcoin more quick and easy to expand for everyone
Double whammy!!!
As long it is on everybody best interest, they should get it right.
Crypto ain't stopping cause of segwit or bitcoin.
Keep on steemit !!
*@pouchon
Source
Good thing there are nice people like you to inform the stupid people like me on what is what. Thanks for taking the time to write this and I wish you all the best in your future crypto adventures.
( ˘ ³˘)♥
P.S You kinda look like a friend I know.
Good write up and simple explanation of what this whole issue actually is. My biggest concern is the rush to get this implemented before the code can be properly vetted. The most important aspect of all this is that it works and to make sure there isn't any bugs. This is what worries me the most.
That's my concern too. But then again ever since I went through the whole DAO thing I feel this way.
No matter what happens before Aug 1st. HOLD YOUR BITCOIN!
Don't be this guy:
You make really good simplified posts about these things. There's an argument to be made that crypto crowds the platform too much - though I'm not saying it's necessarily the case - but these are worth a resteem since there are a lot of non-crypto people on the site, and I'm sure they can benefit from these.
I especially liked the video you made explaining the ongoing BTC drama. It was the simplest way I'v seen anyone explain it.
"Upvoted and resteemed."
Thank you very much for saying that man.
Great post for those new to crypto (me included).
Who on Steemit is HODL (holding on for dear life) a small (or large) Bitcoin stash? Who is worried about what's happening to BTC?
You got an upvote (not worth much sorry) & resteem
Steem on beyond the moon, we know we can go further than that. Good luck to us all.
Thank you for summarising what is going on @exyle
So much is happening I can't even keep up
I hope Bitcoin doesn't fracture but the scary thing is, is how much power the miners have.
I hope everything is smooth going and nothing detremental happens.
Let's just buckle up and enjoy the ride
Really good and understandable article! Thank you for writing it!
I am new in the crypto currencies' world and I really enjoy when someone put the effort to explain a tough topic in a simple way.. then you are sure, they understand what they are talking about!
Please keep writing these articles, they are really appreciated and helpful! :)
Thank you.
It appears that you are trying to be funny and sarcastic. But in this case... really?
You put it in your title, as well as the way you signed your message, so I'm trying to figure out if you are seriously concerned that they wrote the code and didn't check it.
....Do you believe someone just wrote the code, and no tests were done on it? No one looked at it? They're blindfolded and just hoping it works?
I don't get the funny jab in this case.
I'd like to hope and consider there is some pretty intelligent people working on Bitcoin's core at the moment.
We will probably be fine. I'd be surprised if we weren't.
It's not a funny jab. It's a real concern. It's potentially a rushed job because of the UASF deadline. I remember the DAO very well in Ethereum. That was supposed to be rock solid too. Maybe that's where my fear of these things come from.