You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Communism, Capitalism, Anarchy, and Honesty
You get an upvote just for the red flag comment.
😆
No slaves no masters is fairly straightforward. I think many times confusion comes in where the definition of the word slave or master seems to vary between individuals.
Whenever discussing such things I try to immediately ask the other side of said discussion to define what they mean by ___.
It's best to find common ground where we can, eliminate the need for a coercive state, preferably through peaceful means and leave the infighting at the door. Much easier said than done when seeking the truth.
All too often we see the argument that, "if I disagree with your voluntary associations and exchanges, you are wrong to engage in them." This is statism, not anarchism. Similarly, "I don't like how you are using that property, so therefore it is illegitimate property." It is necessary to at least apply the NAP as a basic measure before such conclusions can be drawn.