It sounds more of a stance of sovereignty, rather than voluntaryism? The constitution is a document that is "supposed to be followed, and many contributors warned of what we have today. I cannot fault the words or the paper they are written on, but completely hold fault with the ppl who claim to be constitutional scholars! Especially the last one that held office... I digress.

I see value in the sovereign movement, and there was a time where we held alluvial (edit allodial --- auto correct) title, names printed in title case, so on an such. If I am mistaken I apologize, actually I do so now as I am not attempting to place a "label" on you. Regardless, good luck and thanks for not lighting me up :)

Its good to agree to disagree...

Chris