SLC22-W5/ GENDER VIOLENCE
Steem greetings @everyone on the Steemit ecosystem and welcome to my blog as I share ideas on the topic “Gender Violence”.
Before I go into the main subject of the day permit me first to give a brief understanding of what gender violence is all about. It is considered any harmful act perpetrated on a person against their will which leads to abuse of power due to inequality on both men and women.
When I talk about “power”, this is where the word acts in different ways and when abused, it leads to violence in different aspects and mostly affects women while perpetrators are mostly men. Power means the ability, freedom and your capacity to influence and control decisions about your life. Most often men often abuse their power to the extent that leads to violent perpetrated acts.
Part I
Please tell us if there is a special law in your country to protect women's rights and what is your opinion regarding this law. |
---|
Cameroon has a penal code that punishes perpetrators of forced marriages, sexual harrasment, and rape under Article 302 section 1 sub-section 1. Notwithstanding, this law does not address domestic violence nor consider it as a violation of human rights.
The government also created the national commission on Human Rights and Freedom which promotes and protect human rights from a general perspective.
However, Cameeoon has ratified a number of conventions and protocols that protects human rights. Cameroon constitution states that any international convention when ratified takes supremacy over national laws. An example of such conventions is the Convention on the Elimination of all Forma of Violence against Women and girls (CEDAW), the Maputo Protocol and also the Protocol of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.
These laws are put in place to protect women's right but most often victims preferred to die in silence because they do not trust the legal system of the country. The judges at times are corrupt and can receive bribes from perpetrators at the detriment of the victim. The victims at times prefer to stay in silence because they fear further humiliation from their host communities. Most of the victims do not speak out.
Please state whether you consider this law to be effective and whether it does not violate the principle of equality before the law enjoyed by both men and women. |
---|
As I earlier mentioned, the laws are put in place to protect women but there is a lot of miscarriage of justice in our legal system.
Most of the judges are men and might not consider the act as women's rights. They are also corrupt and might give unfair judgments to support their fellow men to continue abusing power over women.
Most often judges do not consider the international conventions ratified by Cameroon. They rely on customary rules which at the end unjustly to women.
Part II
From the list of crimes mentioned in class, say which ones you consider may be crimes of gender violence and which ones may be common crimes committed against a woman or women. |
---|
The crimes I classified under gender violence are pepertrated against the person’s will are; physical violence, domestic violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, Trafficking of women, girls and adolescents, and forced prostitution.
Common crimes van be bullying, threats, media violence and institutional violence. These crimes do not directly targets women and perpetrators of these acts do not have a particular gender motive.
Have you or someone close to you been a victim of gender violence? What was the situation? Was the victim able to assert her rights? Do you think the law favoured the victim? |
---|
I used to be a victim of gender violence when I was a kid from my uncle who constantly abused us because we were all girls. We were name-called as “prostitutes” just because we were girls. Now, I'm empowered and I can say I'm now a survivor and no more a victim.
Nonetheless, I have someone close to me who is currently a victim of domestic violence. She is constantly being abused by the husband and the family both psychologically, emotionally and economically. The mother-in-law insults her at any given opportunity, and humiliates her.
She has talked about it to me several times and I tried to intervene but she was not willing to file a complaint for proper legal proceedings for reasons best known to her.
Part III
Case Study 1.
A thief arrives at a restaurant and subdues the customers there so that they give him their belongings. A woman refuses to hand over her cell phone and her money, instead, she confronts the thief so he fires his firearm and shoots the aforementioned woman, causing her death.
Please state whether we are dealing with a femicide or a homicide committed against a woman. Explain your answer. |
---|
I will consider the act as **Homicide” because the act was not targeting a particular gender. The acts of the perpetrator can be considered aas theft and assault that led to the violation of the victim's rights to life.
Case Study 2.
After some time, a man began insulting his wife, telling her that she was not worthy as a woman. He humiliated her, not letting her work or go out, claiming that a woman belongs to the house and cannot go out without her husband's consent.
One day, in the middle of the argument, the woman tried to respond to his insults and he beat her up, leaving her face with bruises.
Please state whether this is a crime of gender violence or a common crime committed against a woman. Explain your answer. |
---|
This is a clear case of gender violence against a woman. The perpetrator who is the husband of the victim insults and humiliates her which causes emotional and psychological violence, he deprived her from her right to work which is economic violence perpetrated on women, and to crown it all, he physical abused her by beating her for trying to speak out.
The perpetrator uses his power wrongfully over the woman because of her gender. His harmful actions were against the wife’s will. His actions are clearly to stay in power and control every decision against the wife’s will.
In summary, gender violence is a complex topic and both men and women are victims. Nonetheless, most victims are women while most perpetrators are men because of abuse of power. Therefore we need to address gender-related violence in an inclusive way.
I will invite @suboohi, @shiftitamanna and @wilmer1988 to share their perspective on the topic.
Why? When someone talks about equal rights, men are always of special concern and their status in view of gender-based violence is always judged as the main suspect. I agree with you, that men are synonymous with power. of course!! but in very few countries in our country it is "proven" that all male judges completely side with the men at the court.
When there is a case in the household, many negative accusations arise due to excessive public intervention for men on the basis that they are physically stronger, more emotional and considered kings in the household. I'm not defending my people, not at all.
Many stories say that when a husband forbids his wife from leaving the house or working, it is considered that "the husband has robbed his wife of her rights." I agree! but women must know that humans are heterogeneous, among men it is difficult to trust their wives outside the home, they are excessively jealous, or even that men adhere to religious laws tightly. then, will women, their wives and even the courts punish their husbands? can we change human nature/character in a short time as we wish?
I don't have much to say, but I really enjoyed your writing, and appreciate your great views on advocating against gender-based violence. We hope that all courts can act as wise mediators in all cases of violence.
Good luck @chant
When you check the statistics of victims, the majority are women and of course, this is because of the negative use of power by men. They want to be in control, they want to make the decisions, and I'm terms of access, men still dominate.
Women are also jealous being but they never for once deny the man’s right to work. Put yourself in the place of the woman and how will you feel, when your partner deprived you from working against your will?
Everyone has rights whether man or woman and should be respected. You should not act at your own selfish reasons and expect the other person to succumb to your controlling actions. They have a say as well, they can also make decisions for themselves because they are adults and not be controlled by a man for his own selfish reasons. If the law states that depriving your wife from working is a crime, then you go against the law, then you should be punished.
Hi @chant , I am happy and really respect the reply to this comment..
Speaking in a gender context, the husband is still a man and the wife is still a woman, the nature and roles of these two types cannot be equated at any time. Men must dominate because their responsibilities are greater from the point of view of beliefs and state law.
Wives can't possibly forbid their husbands from working, that's ridiculous! because the husband is the main person responsible for providing for his wife and family, this applies to almost all nations in the world. And, about the “jealousy” sorry! I only obey the sharia of my Islamic faith, in Islam women are not allowed to be jealous because the husband's position as breadwinner must be free without any pressure. And I won't debate this issue with anyone... Because it's a fix for us..
Correct! Everyone has rights and they must be respected. Do you know one of the rights of a wife? He needs more attention, that attention can take the form of protection. Their best protector is their husband, not money, wealth or even the country.
You talk about selfishness! Do you think selfishness means being selfish and not caring about the interests of other people? That's true, if someone is not married and doesn't have a family. You know? Why should a husband be selfish? Because the husband must be selfish, the meaning of "self" here is his family, the husband is selfish because he must fight to get his rights and justice out there so that he can provide adequate needs for his wife and family. Not for personal needs. ...Sorry, I'm have going a little deeper so that everyone who reads this comment doesn't misunderstand what I mean by being selfish.
If you read my post from start to finish, you know that I strongly challenge gender-based violence in any form. In this context, I also do not prohibit or limit my wife's rights, do you know why? because their rights (men and women) have been innate since birth.
And! Not all gender behavior demands equality. Because nature limits things that are normal but inappropriate for a woman/wife to do.
Thank you very much. There are many positive things from your comments. We discussed it a little excitingly and a lot in this context but still realize that we are in a much bigger and more important context.
I am not against your culture but what I want to say is that bad aspects of culture that dehumanized another fellow human being should not be promoted.
What happened to your kids when death takes you away, your wife will have to suffer to raise the kids because she was deprived of working. @aviral123 might want to share her experience on this.
Don't you think your wife working and earning is a surplus to your family income?
Yes, bad aspects of culture should not be promoted. I agree. Maybe you mean patriarchy? It doesn't need to be promoted because almost all countries in the world have a black record of discriminatory culture against women, and most of it is done by those closest to them. Those who know the true meaning of culture will appreciate it as the identity of a region.
For point 2, you have actually answered yourself in your previous comment.
Is there a country that prohibits women whose husbands leave them from being allowed to remarry? Or if women no longer want to remarry, where is the state's responsibility other than just being smart in making gender regulations and containing thousands of words about saving women's rights, giving equal status and even providing welfare to women?
You know? The government of a country is only able to make gender regulations to be followed up by third parties, while the government itself is hands-off, neglecting old widows, orphaned girls dropping out of school and likes to punish women's mistakes because of trivial matters. Don't force me to give examples, because I'll hate it even more...
For some reason, I feel happy talking about this with you, you have opened my insight and way of thinking to a positive direction, I really appreciate your good intentions..., don't get carried away because each of us lives a different role and culture, as well as the legal system country, customs and religion...