L'italia del XXI secolo, la costruzione dell' USE

Tutto iniziò negli anni 70 del XX secolo, il partito comunista italiano guidato da Enrico Berlinguer propose alla democrazia cristiana un patto di governo, il compromesso storico. nel 1976 si formò il governo Andreotti "governo monocolore di solidarietà nazionale" con l'appoggio esterno del PCI (partito comunista italiano). Aldo Moro, presidente della DC e favorevole al compromesso storico, finì assassinato per mano delle cosidette "brigate rosse". Oggi le socialdemocrazie europee rappresentate dall' iSD vivono una crisi, calano in tutta europa ed in particolare in Germania ed Italia. Perchè? Le socialdemocrazie assicurano tutela alle fascie deboli con un welfare adeguato ed una politica del lavoro volta ad incrementare le assunzioni, se calano in consensi è chiaro che le fasce interessate si trovano scontente e votano altri schieramenti per protesta. Se noterete la storia si ripete, basta leggere le politiche dall'800 ad oggi. Oggi si lavora alla costruzione del governo italiano, ho smesso di guardare i telegiornali perchè tutti, in modo insistentemente ripetitivo, mescolano allo stesso modo: citano tutte le opposizioni possibili ed immaginabili sia interne quanto esterne in ambito UE. Il nodo, a quanto sembra, risiede nel candidato ministo dell'economia Savona, ecco un saggio del suo pensiero:

in English
It all began in the 70s of the twentieth century, the Italian Communist Party led by Enrico Berlinguer proposed a pact of government, the historic compromise, to Christian democracy. in 1976 the Andreotti government was formed as a "single-color government of national solidarity" with the external support of the PCI (Italian Communist Party). Aldo Moro, president of the DC and in favor of the historic compromise, was assassinated by the so-called "red brigades". Today the European social democrats represented by the iSD are experiencing a crisis, falling throughout Europe and in particular in Germany and Italy. Because? Social democrats ensure protection of weak groups with adequate welfare and a labor policy aimed at increasing recruitment, if they fall in consensus it is clear that the affected groups are discontented and vote for other sides in protest. If you notice the story repeats, just read the policies from 800 to today. Today we are working on the construction of the Italian government, I stopped watching the news because all, in an insistently repetitive way, mix in the same way: they quote all possible and imaginable opposites both internal and external within the EU. The knot, it seems, resides in the candidate ministo the economy Savona, here is a wise of his thought:
Do you allow my personal opinion that is independent of politics? We hire a simple accountant and submit to it all Italian revenues: excise taxes and taxes on fossil fuels, income from direct and indirect taxes, social security and insurance contributions and EU contributions, etc. etc. we would be faced with unimaginable figures, figures that would repay the public debt in a short time and would allow us to travel on roads with last-generation hydroroabsorbent asphalts, 30 hours a week working hour at equal wages, free nurseries for everyone, free nursery schools for all, no university tax, completely free health and the possibility, after having completely defeated national poverty, to welcome millions of immigrants who only ask for a job and a social status. Forgive the historical recourses, it is about economy and not politics, but to understand the current context it is necessary a historical analysis: we all know the great world economic crisis after the great war, dating back to the 20s of the twentieth century, as 'Italy? The Italian government set up the IRI (industrial reconstruction institute). The crisis came out, a mutual institution was set up, 40 hours a week for workers and pensions. This shows that for a sovereign state there is nothing that can not be done, today they have solid evidence from the USA, China, Japan, Russia etc. etc. The anomaly in this world context is Europe, a land that in the past has produced world wars, Europe is anomalous in relation to other European states, it is not a state but not even a federation of states like the United States of America who arranged things last century. Enough, the moment of responsibility has come, I think I see the parochial controversies of small mountain fractions contending for a santella, enough. It is time to set up the USE, the United States of Europe, otherwise it will be reminiscent of the Lombard region of Veneto, the papal state, the kingdom of Tscana and the reign of the three Sicilies with Cecco / Beppe in Austria commanding the Austroic Empire / Hungarian, enough. The time is ripe, if all the Italian politicians had even a minimal decency, they would be fully compliant to promote USE, the only solution to go forward and not to return to the Middle Ages. USE union of confederate European states, dream of great statesmen of the twentieth century, with a single currency, a single central bank with full powers as, for example, in the USA, a single president voted by all states with full powers, as the US President. The ridiculous thing about all this is that the United States of America, taken as an example, are much younger than Europe but much later, do you remember how America was discovered? and how did England send you uncomfortable settlers to get rid of them? Well today, these former Europeans give lessons in politics and economics and have succeeded, not in a bloodless way, to obtain a constitution, a national and political unity respecting the prerogatives of the single component states. do you know what I say dear European politicians? Go to America and get democracy lessons. Thanks for the attention.