KI: There are arguments that could speak against the classification of IOTA as a security under the Howey Test.

Here are some potential counterarguments:

Use case: IOTA was developed as a cryptocurrency primarily used for the exchange of value and data in the Internet of Things. The primary purpose of IOTA is not to generate profits through investments but to create a secure and efficient ecosystem for IoT transactions.

Decentralization:

Unlike traditional securities where a central company holds control, IOTA is a decentralized network based on distributed ledger technology. The network is operated by participants who validate transactions and keep the system running. There is no central authority distributing profits or dividends to IOTA token holders.

Utility for the network:

Owners of IOTA tokens can utilize the network to process transactions and support the ecosystem. By using their tokens for transactions, they contribute to the security and scalability of the network. The expectation of profits may not be the primary focus, but rather the utility the network provides to participants.

Regulatory clarification:

The IOTA Foundation has made efforts to clarify its relationship with IOTA tokens and their classification. It has emphasized that the tokens should be seen as digital assets rather than securities. However, there has been no official regulatory clarification or court decision on this matter.

Me:

Are there any other arguments, perhaps also because the IOTA Foundation is a non-profit foundation.

KI:

Yes, the fact that the IOTA Foundation is a non-profit organization can be cited as another argument against the classification of IOTA as a security. Here are some points that could support this argument:

Charitable purpose:

The IOTA Foundation was established to advance the development and promotion of IOTA technology. Its main goal is to support the Internet of Things and enable innovative solutions for data exchange and transactions in this domain. As a non-profit organization, the focus of the IOTA Foundation is on fulfilling its charitable purpose rather than maximizing profits for investors.

Token distribution:

The IOTA Foundation did not sell the IOTA token through an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) but through a process called "token distribution." The tokens were distributed to participants in the network according to transparent rules and guidelines. This approach differs from the typical issuance of securities by a company, which often focuses on raising capital.

Open-source project:

IOTA is an open-source project where the development of the technology is driven by a broad community of developers and enthusiasts. This fosters collaboration, transparency, and innovation within the network. The fact that the IOTA technology is publicly accessible and can be further developed by the community supports the argument that it is not a traditional security.

It is important to note that the fact that the IOTA Foundation is a non-profit organization alone is not sufficient to classify IOTA as non-security-like. Please note that this assessment is based on the information available up until September 2021, and it's important to stay updated with the latest developments and consult official sources or the IOTA Foundation for the most accurate and current information.

Please don't forget to like and share the article if it caught your interest.