Good history and summary article, @oneday1! It's too bad that you did not write it. You have not substantially changed the text of the article, but in fact have copied it. What you have done is considered plagerism. It is not enough to simply give article credit, add a couple of words to the title and insert emojis into the text. What you should have done, and I suggest you edit it right away to reflect this, is to have made a heading statement right at the top that this was a reprint of an article, and then cite the original author and publication it appeared in. This still is not acceptable, because the original publisher does not allow complete reprints of their material.

I had upvoted this article because I thought it was your original work. Then I read the comments by @cheetah and @neoxian. I decided to remove my upvote because this article does not follow the standards I have for my curation trail. I have people who have delegated votes to my trail, and I feel a responsibility towards those people to be careful with their votes as well as my own. I'm sorry that I did not read your comments before I voted and resteemed this. Please try to be more transparent at the beginning of your articles when you are simply passing along the work of another author.
Cheers!