Like I stated in a comment yesterday:
Sure does make you wonder whose the push behind this knowing there is so many prominent people involved, is it the Trump administration trying to leverage against the Clinton's Democratic machine or the Democratic machine trying to leverage itself against the Trump administration given how cheerful Pelosi was the other day when she said "we may lose a few of own but let's see where the chips fall". In regard to the latter I guess everyone is considered collateral damage in the quest to get Trump.

I firmly do not believe Trump was involved with Epstein in that fashion, like the article stated he was the only one, and this has been published elsewhere, that came forward during the investigation before of Epstein and that it's a well established fact he banned him from his properties.

As far as the Thomas Jefferson statement it was probably not a wise choice to incorporate that into the article. There has been a conclusive Y chromosome link that the youngest Hemming's boy was father by a male from the Jefferson family, it is highly unlikely that it was from a male other then Thomas Jefferson, whose father in law was the father of Sally Hemming, which made Jefferson's wife her half sister, which upon the father in law's death Thomas Jefferson inherited his father in laws slaves. It is more highly likely that upon Jefferson's wife death that he took up with her half sister than it is that another male from the Jefferson family fathered Sally's children. In other DNA test the probability was strong but not conclusive that all but one of her children more than likely belonged to Jefferson. Using a fallacy to support one's conclusion is generally not a good idea.