You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Globalism and the Hegelian Dialectic: Create the problem that encourages people to embrace the idea you want implemented.
Those evil global Bond-villains causing misery and suffering through uniform measure, legal procedures, commercial contracts, and behavioral reference, resulting in the ease of international commerce! Only if humanity continued to live in fragmented, subsistent tribalism - dying from malnutrition, backwards medical care, and parasitic infections - then they would be enjoying true freedom.
False dichotomy.
Many more choices than that. Globalism does not mean people will get the rulers and the governance they want. Tyrants love the concept of Globalism. It was a driving force for Hitler. It sounded appealing to Mao, to Stalin, and many other tyrannical leaders. It goes back as far as we have recorded history. (for those of us that read and comprehend history... rather than ignoring or erasing what we don't like) that there are those who want to rule the world. I don't know of any of them that were not tyrants. At least I can't find an example.
So if YOU are content to wear shackles that is your choice. When you think you have the right to put other people into shackles too because you like them. No. Come and try. I'll die trying to stop you... or perhaps it is you that will die. ;) Bring it on.
To an ageny of chaos, any and all social stability and order appears as "tyranny." No sane human being will prefer the chaos induced blood-bath of the French Revolution, the French Commune, or to a lesser degree, the innumerable race-riots in the cities of 'Murica to an orderly, well-governed society. Human prosperity and progress has always followed centralised authority managing social stability. From the Principate of Rome to Tang China, human experience provides incontrovertible evidence of proper, natural, prosperous humam social system, as opposed to the savage barbarism of fragmented tribalism from the Germanic tribes to Amazonian natives. If you prefer to live without the amenities of human civilisation, you certainly have the liberty to join the savages in the interior of the Amazon or the Auatralian outback.
Regarding the tyrants of the 20th century, how did these people ascend to power? If you could actually "comprehend history," you will quickly recognize that these mass killers would not have gained power, were it not for the poisonous humanist ideology of freedom and human rights. Either you are a fanatic of a highly toxic ideology, or a cynical opportunist spreading propaganda. Human experience of the past 300-years only demonstrates the pernacious consequence of freedom and human rights in subverting all civilised norms and descency, resulting in unimaginable human suffering and cruelty. What has your precious "freedom" net you other than low-born merchant scum dictating sociocultural policy with base-born muck demanding unearned previleges, all the while society fractures into tribalism?
It is the duty of all thinking, rational humans to work towards erasing any trace of humanist poison from collective sum of human consciousness. Even the merchant scum of our degenerate era recognize the nihilism the ideology of freedom engenders and actively censor them from public consciousness. For the survival of the human race, ideology of chaos must be opppsed, thwarted, and erased. Despite your fanatical religion, the universe does not revolve around you and your whims.