A NEW AND CLEAN LEADERSHIP IS URGENTLY NEEDED. ENOUGH ANTIPOLITICA, ENOUGH TO PLAY THE GAME TO THE GOVERNMENT! - VENEZUELA

Alejandro Andrade, had several years of cooperation with the North American government. Therefore, as a key figure in the process, he went from one moment to the next, to oblivion. The comrades never forgave him for changing the revolutionary discourse for the horses and the good life of capitalism itself. I doubt that the former treasurer of the nation has been a prisoner for a long time. The Americans use their case to reach the smallest circles of the civic-military union that has governed the country for 19 years.
It is part of the pressure put on Maduro to negotiate a political solution and soon.
The problem is that there are some characters that do not understand that kind of scenarios or their complications. His is a perennial conspiracy. Their game consists in dividing us, in disrupting the unit accusing the moderates of blandengues and placing them as cuatriboleados.

In his imagination, Maduro is about to resign, to run away. Because in an attack of good sense he gave to recognize that it does not even serve to cover a gap. Confident in such predictions these enlightened play to international pressure, as a barbarian, kill everything. A military rebellion serves them as well as the armed intervention of the Americans. Like a flu or a meteor. Overall, the outcome is inevitable.

But, it turns out that politics is not so elementary. Reality is usually more raw than fiction. No resignations or resignation from office. Maduro believes himself to be the winner and wants to spend 6 more years in Miraflores. He has let him know that even when he agrees with a negotiated solution, he rejects any possibility of a short-term presidential election. You may even recognize the AN, change the composition of the TSJ and in Pero, no more there

. The European Union and the Americans are clear that any possibility of a change of government depends on the opposing unity and on what we do, here and now, Venezuelans.
It is a kind of paradox. It turns out that radicals on the left and those on the right tend to be more or less the same. If you put a magnifying glass you will quickly discover that more than antagonistic these "grupetes" are deeply conservative.

The militants of radicalism tend to sell themselves as pure beings, full of nobility, when the truth is that they represent a huge setback in terms of the exercise of democracy. They hate and despise those who think differently. His only truth is what matters. The rest lacks values ​​or principles. That's why the radicals always end in authoritarianism.

In the case of the Venezuelan opposition, this sect (as Capriles called them) has achieved a way to demolish its adversaries. Through networks, from their laboratories, they have dedicated themselves to viralizing hatred, transforming lies into truths, inventing outcomes that do not figure among the most likely scenarios. A tip WhatsApp destroy the reputation of Raimundo and the whole world. Through the networks they have gone from a petty minority to a loose majority. As they are deeply undemocratic, they have focused their attacks on political parties and on the rational exercise of politics. This is how today, these keyboard hooded people impose emotionality as a discourse and anti-politics in fashion.

They have the road open. Communication hegemony and censorship have reduced information in traditional media almost to nothing. That urgent need for information, the radicals fill it with chains where the credibility of the most well-known leaders, of the AN, of the parties and the businessmen is undermined.

These grupetes have achieved what the revolution could not, divide the opposition and give oxygen to a government that more than 70% of the country rejects. They sell a narrative in which it turns out that the ruling party has been in power for 19 years thanks to the betrayal of a soft opposition sector that has sold all our struggles. They do not mention in the least the repression or abuse of state power in all these long years by the
Officialism Nor do they talk about mistakes or wrong calculations on the part of the opposition. There are no inconsistencies or immediacy.

For the walls of the keyboard the thing is simple; Capriles is a coward; Henry Ramos a thief; Rosales a brute and Falcon a fake. 2 plus 2 then. The perverse thing is that while the leaders of the unit are presented as dragged, the radicals appear in the networks as brave.

Here happened on April 11, there was oil strike, 2 exits and the guilt of how much defeat there is only those mental weak who still insist on going to elections with the same fraudulent CNE as always. 4 months of street in 2017. A lot of dead and none of these was able to recognize that the street had stagnated and, in the midst of fatigue, it was essential to turn it over as a rudder to avoid that the fighting spirit will end in depression collective Zero damage control.

If we scan well these speeches that flood Instagram, Facebook, we will find that the destructive criticism towards parties and politicians lies in huge shortcomings. Its protagonists neither have strong organizations nor are real politicians. There is, as Petkoff said, no logic or feature of rationality in his proposals. Everything refers to emotions, to "I believe that ..."

Politicians are necessary, among other things, because they have a culture of debate that permanently obliges them to correct errors. They know that the scenarios move and you have to be evaluating things permanently. Otherwise, there is no possible victory, you do not come to power. The antipolitics is the arbitrariness in pasta.

Let's see how these sectors are acting at the moment. Recall that these people first invented the collaborationists and that way we were led to lose vital spaces in mayorships and governorates with the story of abstention. They have passed I do not know how many months of the re-election of Maduro and forget a single critical reflection on the matter. They insist on the exits of as if nothing.

The worst thing is that, in his delirium, these factors have insisted on fracturing the opposition more and more without stopping to think about how much they help the government with these positions.

With the vote of the Zapatero case in the AN and now with the
Andrade's trial, they intend to put us all in the same bag. Even Alberto Ravel has tried to draw attention to this crazy witchcraft. Vladimir Villegas is a front man, Luis Chataing a pesetero, Sergio Novelli a bug, Miguel Henrique Otero and his wife some delinquent and stop counting.

!God! someone has to put a stop to so much foolishness. By this way Maduro is guaranteed, I do not say 6 years, the eternity in power. What is the reason why this harakiri is not corrected when it is obvious that it is causing us enormous harm? It is obvious that his intention is to avoid any negotiation. I ask: In exchange for what?

I argue that this debate must be given. You can not keep leaving so many lies to one side. Or we put the points where they go or we will never raise head. I understand that a part of the democratic leadership is worried about continuing to divide the opposition if we fall into this kind of pitched battle and we bite each other, but it is better to tell the truth than to go through bags.

We have to go back to politics. To be and feel the people who suffer this bad government. Focus the speech on how expensive life is, in the queues, insecurity, lack of services, hunger. Leave radicalism and immersed in its torments and locate the center where we can recompose the majority.

The ni-ni grow because nobody believes in anyone. It is about uniting the country, no longer the unity of the opposition world that seems more dedicated to the internal fights than to dispute the power of Maduro. Urges an intelligent management center that gets out of this vicious circle of faults. Transparent leadership that speaks to the country with the truth and stops repeating the obvious things. Clarity is needed in the north and a lot of journalism that is in charge of verifying what is true or false in all these denunciations that grow as networks in the mountains.