Man wins women's World Championship Cycling event. Where are the feminists???

A man who "identifies" as a woman was allowed to win a woman's cycling event that leads to a possible world championship recently in ...of course...California. He identifies as a woman but doesn't do anything to suppress his testosterone, especially before events like this. So let me understand...because he calls himself a woman, he can do whatever he wants to gain advantages over women, without changing a thing biologically. Sounds to me like he still wants to be a man...HE JUST WANTS TO BE NOTICED FOR SOMETHING he doesn't deserve to be noticed for..beating women in a women's race when he's a MAN. In other words, he has been GIVEN something he blatantly doesn't deserve just because of how he "identifies."

Now, if I identify as rich person, are people going to give me money I don't deserve because I identify as a rich person? Let's try it.... OK...SEND ME ALL YOUR SBD people, I feel like a rich guy, and it is your job to respect my identity choices and to support me in my decisions.

I'll hold my breath and just wait for all the transfers to roll in now. And, if they don't I will probably sue you all for not respecting my identity choices....lol....

Here is an article covering this travesty:

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/man-who-identifies-woman-wins-womens-world-championship-cycling-title

And here is an excerpt from the above link:

" 'A biological male who identifies as a transgender woman won a women’s world championship cycling event on Sunday. 'Rachel' McKinnon, a professor at the College of Charleston, won the women’s sprint 35-39 age bracket at the 2018 UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships in Los Angeles.' But, McKinnon, apparently, is unwilling to forego any physical advantage testosterone might give a biological male..."

Where are the radical feminists? How is allowing crap this empowering women?? Indeed, it is OBVIOUSLY dis-empowering women. You'd think there would be feminists marching in the Streets of Los Angeles over this, but...no. So what can we deduce from the fact that feminists are, apparently, just fine with this? I say it must be because their radical agenda fits, dovetail perfectly, with the "transgender" (ungendering) agenda for society as a whole.

Radical feminists want to destroy the Biblical, male-led family unit. "Transgenders" want to destroy the idea of maleness and femaleness altogether. All of it leads to even more power for the global police state, wimped down men across the globe unable to resist, and children raised (and brainwashed) from the crib outside traditional families to support whatever the state wants/says.

The stakes are truly that high.