Susan Wojkicki isn't the CEO and they have publicly stated a commitment to free expression.
Many creators have adopted the platform, while I agree that decentralized projects are a better option, they lack the level of adoption enjoyed by BitChute.
The fact that it is based in the United Kingdom is concerning given the UK's government seeming wanton zeal for censoring people (I'd include the despicable treatment visited upon Tommy Robinson among some of the other issues you've already identified).
BitChute is actually a peer-to-peer platform, it is based on WebTorrent.
I do support projects that are less centralized that BitChute, such as DTube, but I don't know of another platform that has enjoyed adoption by creators more than BitChute, which, while unfortunate, is key to functioning as a proper surrogate to YouTube.
Ultimately, with the censorship issue, it seems unlikely a truly decentralized platform is possible with today's internet infrastructure. Someone has to register a domain and host the website's code, which is always going to introduce a degree of centralization even in blockchain based projects.
how many point of access does bitchute has? single point of access = single point of failure...
Tommy... assange, prince andrew, jimmy saville... the true uk revealed, it's not for no reason that france waged war against this perfid entity...
you don't understand bittorrent or i2p or freenet... it's uncensorable... end. you just upload a file in your node, publish it, other node seed it, and it's gone... unstoppable... modern noding don't know what they store, everything is encrypted... it's just a big fish game, and the infrastructure is perfect for it, the problem is that stupid people posing low quality videos are surprised that their contents doesn't get shared :)...
it's under uk jurisdiction, what don't you get there ? assange? rapes by the thousands accross the uk? prince andrew? what else do you need?
and worst, you forget the history of youtube, they said the same things, and then the pepsi child rapist guy arrived and things changed...
so you fall in the same trap...
help in increase adoption of p2p based... nothing says to not post on centralized, just use centralized as back ups, not main...
help, participate, don't be a willing slave...
The fact that it is based in the United Kingdom is concerning given the UK's government seeming wanton zeal for censoring people (I'd include the despicable treatment visited upon Tommy Robinson among some of the other issues you've already identified).
BitChute is actually a peer-to-peer platform, it is based on WebTorrent.
I do support projects that are less centralized that BitChute, such as DTube, but I don't know of another platform that has enjoyed adoption by creators more than BitChute, which, while unfortunate, is key to functioning as a proper surrogate to YouTube.
Ultimately, with the censorship issue, it seems unlikely a truly decentralized platform is possible with today's internet infrastructure. Someone has to register a domain and host the website's code, which is always going to introduce a degree of centralization even in blockchain based projects.
how many point of access does bitchute has? single point of access = single point of failure...
Tommy... assange, prince andrew, jimmy saville... the true uk revealed, it's not for no reason that france waged war against this perfid entity...
you don't understand bittorrent or i2p or freenet... it's uncensorable... end. you just upload a file in your node, publish it, other node seed it, and it's gone... unstoppable... modern noding don't know what they store, everything is encrypted... it's just a big fish game, and the infrastructure is perfect for it, the problem is that stupid people posing low quality videos are surprised that their contents doesn't get shared :)...