You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is EOS’s new Social Media Platform VOICE.com Facebook 2.0 Mark of the Beast?
I'm keeping an open mind. If they want censorship proof and no-bots then I'd love to see what their tech solution is for that. There's quite a bit they can do at the front-end. But if the Voice system starts encouraging third party apps then I can well imagine a black-market opening up for keys. Get your grandma to go through KYC and then sell the account keys. Let's see - there's a lot of room for innovation in this space.
I do get the article's point that Voice's implementation seems to be a step backwards in terms of p2p dApp-ness. Maybe that's a necessary thing to drive adoption.
When every account has a reputation and is linked to a real world person it does remove the problem of bots (only humans allowed) and it produces self censorship because if you have more to lose than to gain by saying something inappropriate then why would you?
No. It doesn't. I reckon you could find a lot of people who don't care about the Voice account and would rather have $50 or whatever. That and hacking keys, identity theft and you probably can't attach an IRL person to a voice ID in any meaningful sense. Yeah, harder for bots but not impossible.
Hi @eturnerx
Appreciate your comment buddy. Thx for sharing your opinion with us.
Yours, Piotr