BTW, what is knee jerk reaction about anything I said? I brought up valid and intrepid questions, questions that were asked only because of the claims you made.

You sit there and literally preach about things that are completely irrelevant to the shape of the world, and you offer vanishing points as any explanation of horizon, as if things seemingly vanishing into the distance can explain their movements across the sky. The fact that you still cannot have any explanation for the horizon is only mirrored by what you think is "simple explanation" for the horizon, and you must either be totally inept in reasoning if you think that discerning an object vanishing into the distance explains the object moving across the sky, or the horizon, or the bulge that you can see from a passenger seat on any commercial flight. You can claim that everything is a lie, you can claim that your "facts" are holes in "NASA's" shape of the world, but you also think that me questioning your thoughts and opinions on these things is a "knee jerk reaction" after you dared to accuse me of being unquestionable while you at the same time are grasping at pure, unadulterated nonsense for the basic explanation of horizon, or why things seemingly fall behind the horizon, and you offer a hare brain model that is as flawed and ridiculous as explaining things vanishing into the distance as the reason why the sun, the moon, constellations and large geographic features fall behind the horizon without any kind of vanishing due to distance. You see, those mountains don't vanish off into haze on a clear high noon day, they can be seen peeking over the horizon from hundreds of miles. You see, that lighthouse you speak of, also, like every other thing, vanishes behind the horizon and not into the distance. You can tie in fe nonsense into the rampant pedophilia and child sacrifice that the elites are engaged in but it only harms the later and the later being true won't ever explain a conspiracy over the shape of the world. I can understand why a conspiracy exists to uphold the myth of "closed systems" that thermodynamics posits and "conservation of energy", because it works in hand with the scarcity mindset. The same mindset is present all over the fe and concave/convex earth, and living inside a toroidal earth, it only posits space as an illusion and puts us in a bubble, it invalidates many worlds in turn and is endemic to the scarcity mindset that profits the same pedophiles that rule the world. The irony is that there is absolutely no reason to uphold a conspiracy about the most mundane of things, and which numerous professions depend on, like putting satellites in orbit. You want me to believe that the insurmountable amount of imaging data from thousands of telescopes, from hundreds if not thousands geostationary satellite and dozens of interplanetary satellites that mapped numerous moons and all of the planets, that cataclysmic effort was all into lying about us living inside a dome, by conflicting parties such as the Russian and United States Space Program/Projects and stretching as far back as antiquity? Lying about an infinite number of galaxies with billions of stars with trillions of moons and planets for no other purpose that to hide the true shape of the world and you think that me questioning such a vast conspiracy which again has zero sense in it's ends and doesn't profit the conspirators at all, that means I'm indoctrinated and am defending "lies" while you sit there and honestly think that things vanishing into the distance is the same as things vanishing behind the horizon, a horizon that is clearly missing from your so called theoretical model and would make things indeed vanish into a haze, as they move higher and higher in the sky? The irony is so strong with you, you are about as critical of what you say as you think I am of NASA, as if this was EVER about one agency.

Posted using Partiko Android