the duties of the whole human being

The right to life is the right of any human being for the simple fact of existing and being alive; it is considered a fundamental right of the person. Life has several factors; human life in its bodily and psychic forms, the social life of people through which they perform works in common and the life of nature that relates human beings to other living species. So when this right is regulated are taken into account these three facets of life that are divided but are taken as a whole at the time of being regulated, that is, the correct fulfillment of these three points within what represents respect for this right they make the human being not only survive (to have vital functions, but to live fully, which suggests integrity).

In my neighborhood many abortions are seen, they have unwanted pregnancies, but there are others that without being planned have the baby facing everything, for example: a friend of the school was pregnant last year, she was in 9th grade and she was in a party, danced and had fun with friends, when in that she liked a boy and then "the desire could more", the girl was pregnant and then to tell the boyfriend he was angry and told him that if he came to having the child she had to stick to the responsibility alone, because he was going to perform military service and was not going to answer for the baby, because she thought that life was going to end that she had no support from anyone and that the most possible thing was to abort, fortunately she had a very pretty daughter told her mother and the mother gave her enough support, the boyfriend was finally denounced for attempting for the life of a child ... he lost his military career and at this moment he is in the jail the.

This leads to a reflection on abortion is not a solution, we only know that we have a life that in the future will represent us, we must always overcome the moments that life gives ...

In short "YES TO LIFE, NOT ABORTION" respect the life of the baby that arrives to brighten up our lives ...

Respect is earned does not impose

With the publication of this text I will not take the animosity of the readers, but of some of my colleagues, the need to write is given because I see with pity the way in which pedagogy and the teaching exercise is dehumanized.

The school means for many students the space of greater security, tranquility and sociability, but reality is not rosy. The most complex challenge in the teaching of these days is to convince young people about the importance of education and more when the world we are living in has so much computer noise that it can sometimes trigger the belief that the superfluous it is the important thing, because there is a great majority of young people that the least interested is learning. These young people who believe they have reality in the computer and social networks urgently need to humanize and relate better. During primary and secondary education, each level has its characteristics: age, sociocultural environment, accompaniment at home, among other characteristics. Consequently, demanding respect and values ​​from students is not achieved through force or imposition and although there are situations in which the disposition, discipline, demand and follow-up of instructions must be in a more strict manner than in others, "perpetual formality" can create a monstrous artificiality in the pedagogical relationship.

Several years ago I work as a teacher and within what I have learned - because teachers also learn during our exercise, and a lot - is that the respect that is required of students is earned, not imposed. The coercive and punitive measures are of little use. I do not judge with moralina because I know that I have also been an architect and a manipulator of university power, especially in my first years of teaching; This is the occasion to offer an apology to the students who had the bad luck to hold on. What is the use of imposing respect? It serves to distance. To isolate and isolate them. To maintain an aura of false camaraderie, to emulate the hypocrisy of the work environment and that is unfortunate for a student who has an obligation to learn and longs to be in a friendly and fraternal scenario.

Requiring students to advocate for respect, norms and apply values ​​from a desk or simply track the accumulation of errors they make causes the distancing to increase. How much freedom is cut when dealing with students as subordinates who should be removed from the position each time they see a teacher and then respond in unison; They should always be addressed with signs such as: teacher, graduate, teacher and even doctor; forced to silence the step of the teacher, or even worse when they are recriminated for a specific reason and this is done without a direct treatment because the name of the student is unknown. Not with that I am generalizing, I have also seen coordinators, rectors and vice-rectors who have never abandoned the chair and achieve such empathy with their students that they teach more than what a science, discipline or art demands. For them my admiration.

Respect is not only a configuration of behaviors in certain social situations, it must be a bipartite experience and not only the use of a "cultured and refined" language. To dream that schools function as military garrisons is a mistake, for that matter I recommend that you see the famous video of the song Another brick on the wall by Pink Floyd. However, I make a forced step, every crisis teaches and every situation leaves a reflection, we should also thank those teachers because they teach what one should never be.

we all have the same rights no more than anyone or less than anyone we are all equal before the eyes of God