You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The situation of the steemcurator accounts and an unfair situation | ABUSE REPORT #23
Forgive my confusion, would you mind clarifying something for me please...
You've highlighted ngoenyi as a "high suspicious curator". Is this on the basis that she's selected a user from Nigeria as her "post of the week" or by some other criteria?
This means users involved with the curator in same community teams, there’s no other criteria here
Forgive me again but I'm struggling to understand your English. What do you mean by "community teams"?
Continuing to use ngoenyi as the example, she's an admin to 2 communities and a moderator in 3 others. She's also the Nigerian country representative.
Are you saying that the people she has selected are all Nigerian?
Or the posts that she has selected are all from one of those 5 communities?
Or that she's voting for people that you believe to be her friends?
Or that's she's voting for people who are transferring funds to her wallet?
I think everything is explicitly explained in the post. Meaning that if curator is admin/mod of X and Y community and the selection is also there as admin/mod then used red to identify a possible relation.
Thanks for commenting
Ok, thank you for clarifying. I read the post but like I said, struggled to understand your English.
Again, using ngoenyi as the example, she is the admin or moderator of 5 communities - 3 of which are amongst the largest and most visited on the platform.
Presumably, she was selected for her involvement in 1 community in particular - steem4nigeria. As I mentioned before, the country that she's also a country representative for.
Whereas you have highlighted her activity as "highly suspicious" which will presumably tarnish her reputation - a little thought and the knowledge that I have stated with you above should make you realise that you highlighting people in this way is rash, uninformed and unfair.
As an anecdote of myself, I curated sports content. I am also the admin of the primary sports community on Steemit. I say primary, perhaps only would be a better choice of word. Were I still a curator, I'd be in your "highly suspicious" category because OBVIOUSLY, I'd be selecting posts within my sports community as my favourite. Is this dishonest? Is it "suspicious"?
Or the fact of the matter....
⚠️ There is a diverse selection of curators from a diverse selection of communities because this method of selecting posts is expected from them ⚠️
I really hope that those who have already visited your post, along with the Steemit team take this information for what it is rather than the implied wrongdoing that this post presents.
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us, I think you are not understanding. The curator is free to select whoever they want, in any community or tag, what stands out is the people who are involved in the moderation of the same community.
You are correct. I've stated twice already that I have struggled to understand your English so "think" is inappropriate because I am "clearly" not understanding.
Are you aware that people who become moderators of big communities are invited to do so because they're extremely good content creators themselves? Or as admins of a big community, their communities are big because of their ability to create content and attract users?
Therefore, why does it come as a surprise when people who are put in this position for being good content creators receive votes from good content curators?
My final thought...
This is without doubt the most honest team of curators that this platform has ever had. Appreciate that, embrace that and concentrate your efforts on finding new joiners who copy and past content.
Scrap that - here's my final thought...
@steemcurator01 doesn't blindly vote on the posts that are selected as you'll see from their historical comments. They read the posts and if a selection is made that they feel is underserving, you'll see a polite comment along the lines of "was there a shortage of quality content this week?"
And then by no coincidence, you'll notice that these people aren't selected as curators again.
I’ll avoid repeating my words.
I'll summarise mine...
The implied accusations that you are making are bollocks.