RE: How to Detect AI Comments
Lol your reply was really funny to that guy, that's why I really like you, you are quick to caution bad stuff. Meanwhile I get your reason for your comment, but I want to remind you something that triggered the innovation of steem engagement.
Sincerely before the engagement challenge many users including me, rarely drops comment and reply others comment, so therefore the drive of engagement was mostly gotten from posts of users.
Due to this the team started the engagement challenge to help improve the engagement on the platform. Also leaving the winners selection to just the mod and admins, makes it very easy to generate rigged results. But if quality and ai-free comment gets 70% criteria to become a winner of a contest, then it would be very difficult to rig the election of winners.
Despite how hard the steemit team tries to improve the decentralization of the blockchain, some communities are making their communities centralized, because of selfish and greedy desires.
Finally I don't support a user scoring low in post quality but using comment as leavage or reason to win but from my observations most people complaining scored 9.5 or 10 by the moderators of these communities. So how do want to explain to someone an mod scored 10 or 9.5 that his post is of low quality? Or are you people say this mod grade wrongly?.
I want to ask why would an engagement challenge be won without engaging immensely? I also believe the engagement should be modified and stated clearly, because I don't know why the rules of each community running the engagement challenge be different.
For example I saw a community refusing a winner his post because the winner won on another community, this shouldn't happen because it would make people focus on only one community, instead of participating in all communities they can handle and it also counter steemblog statement
Better still, the reason why engagement are won should be stated in the report just as it was done before. For example the number of comments, reply and score should also be added to the report.
I wish I had all the answers to your questions, but I don't.
As for discriminating against winners because they already received a vote from the Steemit Team or because they were chosen by another community, that is wrong and so sad. The best authors regarding quality of post and showing successful engagement should win, and those who need help should be helped.
Lastly, regarding that comment of mine, I know where you come from. We have a name for it in my home language, "blinde sambok" "One way or another, sooner or later, you will be punished for your sins."
Now, I close my comment, as I am supposed to have a few days off with my family. (•ิ‿•ิ)
What was so funny about it?
My good friend 😂😆😆, your question is very much funnier
I don't think you've read this part of my post.
man you must be a comedian. If don't like my comment, please delete it.
You see the problem, steemit is free blockchain platform. Where everyone can share their opinion, so don't know why you are worrying yourself about it
Moreover the comment was to my very old and my very respected friend @patjewell, who I know I wasn't abusive and negative on my comment.
Although I liked your post and I would support in every way to stop ai comment.thank you my friend.