Keep in mind that using AI here is tantamount to a mortal sin.

Ha ha, yes. The fact that the initial use of AI was to deceive the community under the pretence that the work was their own has turned Steemit against it. I guess I've always thought differently to the Steemit herd!

I see this as similar to the multi-account perception. I've got a lot of accounts - probably too many to remember and there's a perception that people should only have one. But if used honestly and transparently, it can be used for good. Which is how I'm approaching AI with sports content.

It still takes a surprising amount of effort to get the generated text to be accurate and make sense. Some of the problems I encountered were:

• Timings of events - things that happened on 31 minutes were included in the 2nd half. A team equalised in the 60th minute and then went on to lose in the 35th.
• Missing events: Some goals weren't even included.
• Inaccurate information: Since Chat-GPT's only trained up to September 2021, some players play for different clubs. In the case of Arsenal v. Man City, Chat-GPT thought Gabriel Jesus still played for Man City so included a section about Man City getting frustrated when both Ederson and Jesus were booked.

So even then, without any kind of reward for this effort (either via engagement or financial - neither of which are guaranteed) might render the project a horrible waste of effort. In the olden days, @steem.dao would've been available to reward people for promotion.

Therefore, your new account is doomed to numerous angry comments, remarks by curators and possibly a warning from abuse-watcher.

I might contact the abuse-watcher team so that they know what I'm doing. Interestingly, @disconnect put my original article through an AI checker and it was only flagged at 17%. I'm continuing to tweak it (to introduce a sense of humour, hopefully) so that might even come down with future articles. It'll make for another interesting article. Eventually, only the Diary Game can be trusted 🤣

Update: But if this approach is rewarded. we’ll have 100 copy cats doing the same thing for the wrong reasons