If it's interesting to you and if you considered it necessary, then with your script, you can compile a list of authors of the WOX community that are in the club100, club75 and club5050. I think that for this almost unnecessary change in the code, only use the community tag.
In addition, you are a moderator and you can pin post with a list. Maybe it would have eased SC01 and other curators work in such a large community.
The #club50-100 is community Counterproductive brings envy and dissatisfaction because usually the same users are only taken into account and also users who are not in a community are often overlooked. In addition, the big vote is often disproportionate to the contribution.
With such votes, you could pay developers who really advance the Steem!
My opinion.
Der #club50-100 ist community Kontraproduktiv bringt Neid und Unzufriedenheit weil meist die selben User nur berücksichtigt werden und zudem User die nicht in einer Gemeinschaft sind oft übersehen werden zudem steht das Big Vote oft in keinem Verhältnis zum Beitrag.
Mit solchen Votes könnte man Entwickler bezahlen die den Steem wirklich voran bringen !
Meine Meinung .
VgA
This initiative encourages authors to build their accounts and in the future they will be able to support each other. Maybe it's not perfect. Any solution has advantages and disadvantages. Unfortunately, no one has offered a better one yet.
And how many do you think a power down when the steemcurator stops his votes.
Oleh most see in the club tags only an easy way to fill their wallet in this way no one is tied to the steem.
I have been on the steem since January 2018 and have only met a few users who see themselves "really" connected to steem. The best example was the founding of Hive and how the users who were supposedly so connected to Steem changed. They just traveled after the doller or acquaintance.
I would also like a big vote of Steemcurator01, I'm also happy with money, but I say no to these clubtags because they are not conducive to steem!
Wieviel Accounts sollten das sein 200 vielleicht?
Und wieviele machen wohl ein Power down wenn der steemcurator seine Votes einstellt .
Oleh die meisten sehen in den Club Tags nur eine einfache Möglichkeit ihre Wallet zu füllen auf diese Art und Weise wird niemand an den Steem gebunden .
Ich bin seit Januar 2018 auf dem Steem und habe nur wenig User kennen gelernt die sich „wirklich“ steemverbunden sehen . Das beste Beispiel war die Gründung von Hive und wie die User gewechselt haben die doch angeblich so Steemverbunden waren. Sie sind einfach dem doller oder Bekannten hinterher gereist .
Mir würde auch ein Bigvote des Steemcurator01 gefallen , ich bin auch froh mit Geld , aber ich sage nein zu diesen clubtags weil sie nicht förderlich für den steem sind!
VgA
Attracted by the big votes, users write because of the votes and many no longer communicate but only think about the next post to only often use the tags club50/50/75/100. Smaller votes more in width would be better or completely set and the big votes for developers who continue to develop the platform the community leader, mots have work of plagiarism because attracted by the big votes
Chriddi has already written you a lot about it
Angezogen durch die Bigvotes schreiben User wegen der Votes und viele kommunizieren nicht mehr sondern denken nur an den nächsten Post um nur oft die tags club50/50/75/100 nutzen . Kleiner Votes mehr in die Breite wären besser oder ganz einstellen und die Big votes für Entwickler nutzen die die Platform weiter entwickeln die Community leader, mots haben Arbeit von Plagiaten weil angezogen von den Big Votes
Chriddi hat dir ja dazu auch schon einiges geschrieben
VgA
I witnessed that before SC01 started handing out big votes, the authors also did not communicate with each other. Yes, many authors write for the sake of a big vote, but for this they are forced not to use bid bots and write quality content. Some succeed better, some worse. But in general you will never find a shitty post supported by SC01.
In general, I do not consider the idea of supporting authors who create quality content bad. I hope that with this support, many authors will increase their SP and support each other. Maybe my hopes are in vain.
SC01 supports programmers and developers. I would be interested to see what it would be like if one of them wrote a proposal.
The club75 and club5050 are much more difficult to figure out at the moment because I can't really calculate how much is powered up or how much is transferred for contest prizes. If I can figure it out at some point, then I can add it in 🤔
If it's interesting to you and if you considered it necessary, then with your script, you can compile a list of authors of the WOX community that are in the club100, club75 and club5050. I think that for this almost unnecessary change in the code, only use the community tag.
In addition, you are a moderator and you can pin post with a list. Maybe it would have eased SC01 and other curators work in such a large community.
Hallo @oleh
The #club50-100 is community Counterproductive brings envy and dissatisfaction because usually the same users are only taken into account and also users who are not in a community are often overlooked. In addition, the big vote is often disproportionate to the contribution.
With such votes, you could pay developers who really advance the Steem!
My opinion.
Der #club50-100 ist community Kontraproduktiv bringt Neid und Unzufriedenheit weil meist die selben User nur berücksichtigt werden und zudem User die nicht in einer Gemeinschaft sind oft übersehen werden zudem steht das Big Vote oft in keinem Verhältnis zum Beitrag.
Mit solchen Votes könnte man Entwickler bezahlen die den Steem wirklich voran bringen !
Meine Meinung .
VgA
This initiative encourages authors to build their accounts and in the future they will be able to support each other. Maybe it's not perfect. Any solution has advantages and disadvantages. Unfortunately, no one has offered a better one yet.
How many accounts should that be 200 maybe?
And how many do you think a power down when the steemcurator stops his votes.
Oleh most see in the club tags only an easy way to fill their wallet in this way no one is tied to the steem.
I have been on the steem since January 2018 and have only met a few users who see themselves "really" connected to steem. The best example was the founding of Hive and how the users who were supposedly so connected to Steem changed. They just traveled after the doller or acquaintance.
I would also like a big vote of Steemcurator01, I'm also happy with money, but I say no to these clubtags because they are not conducive to steem!
Wieviel Accounts sollten das sein 200 vielleicht?
Und wieviele machen wohl ein Power down wenn der steemcurator seine Votes einstellt .
Oleh die meisten sehen in den Club Tags nur eine einfache Möglichkeit ihre Wallet zu füllen auf diese Art und Weise wird niemand an den Steem gebunden .
Ich bin seit Januar 2018 auf dem Steem und habe nur wenig User kennen gelernt die sich „wirklich“ steemverbunden sehen . Das beste Beispiel war die Gründung von Hive und wie die User gewechselt haben die doch angeblich so Steemverbunden waren. Sie sind einfach dem doller oder Bekannten hinterher gereist .
Mir würde auch ein Bigvote des Steemcurator01 gefallen , ich bin auch froh mit Geld , aber ich sage nein zu diesen clubtags weil sie nicht förderlich für den steem sind!
VgA
Maybe I don't fully understand you. If SC01 stops clubs, will it be better for the platform?
Attracted by the big votes, users write because of the votes and many no longer communicate but only think about the next post to only often use the tags club50/50/75/100. Smaller votes more in width would be better or completely set and the big votes for developers who continue to develop the platform the community leader, mots have work of plagiarism because attracted by the big votes
Chriddi has already written you a lot about it
Angezogen durch die Bigvotes schreiben User wegen der Votes und viele kommunizieren nicht mehr sondern denken nur an den nächsten Post um nur oft die tags club50/50/75/100 nutzen . Kleiner Votes mehr in die Breite wären besser oder ganz einstellen und die Big votes für Entwickler nutzen die die Platform weiter entwickeln die Community leader, mots haben Arbeit von Plagiaten weil angezogen von den Big Votes
Chriddi hat dir ja dazu auch schon einiges geschrieben
VgA
I witnessed that before SC01 started handing out big votes, the authors also did not communicate with each other. Yes, many authors write for the sake of a big vote, but for this they are forced not to use bid bots and write quality content. Some succeed better, some worse. But in general you will never find a shitty post supported by SC01.
In general, I do not consider the idea of supporting authors who create quality content bad. I hope that with this support, many authors will increase their SP and support each other. Maybe my hopes are in vain.
SC01 supports programmers and developers. I would be interested to see what it would be like if one of them wrote a proposal.
The club75 and club5050 are much more difficult to figure out at the moment because I can't really calculate how much is powered up or how much is transferred for contest prizes. If I can figure it out at some point, then I can add it in 🤔
Then it is better not to bother. I don't think it's very useful. Curators check clubs anyway.