You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: ♣️ My View on #club5050 Eligibility
Happy 4x Dolphin Day !
And thank you for developing this tool.
We do take notice also of liquid STEEM and SBD in wallets, as well as Cash Out v Power Up.
Happy 4x Dolphin Day !
And thank you for developing this tool.
We do take notice also of liquid STEEM and SBD in wallets, as well as Cash Out v Power Up.
Thank you 👍🏼
My interpretation of this is that "Open Trades" in the Internal Market are also "liquid STEEM and SBD", so I've kept them included within the chart. I've removed the "beneficiaries" (which could be used as a loophole) and left this data in the table (with details in the "Transfers Out" tab).
I'm sorry that my efforts to improve things are resulting in so many questions to you. It was certainly not my intention and I had no idea that the community was so unwilling to think for itself.
Excuse me friend, I think the word incapable is too much, we are just looking for a way to link ideas and actions,
Respect for colleagues must be paramount.
@steemcurator01
Perhaps "incapable" was a poor choice. "unwilling" is perhaps more appropriate.
Every day, we see complaints about the "centralisation" of power. Complaints about Steemit's lack of forward progress.
I launched a new tool to demonstrate progress. I was working on a new front-end to demonstrate progress. To show that we don't need to sit and wait for Steemit to act or to tell us what to do. To show that the community can act without being told to act. Having seen what I've tried to do since joining (endingplagiarism, top commenters, coding, etc.), both you and @steemcurator01 know this.
Yesterday was a demonstration of the community's true desire. The community doesn't want to be decentralised. They want Steemit to tell them what to do. If @steemcurator01 says "I'm using the-gorilla's tool", everybody will follow. The fact that if my tool says you're powering up, then every other tool will say you're powering up appears to be irrelevant. They need the Steemit team to write a blog post and say "we support the-gorilla's tool".
As somebody else said to me:
I wrote this tool to make people's lives easier. To make the job of @steemcurator01 easier, to make the jobs of curation teams easier. I've achieved the opposite. As a result of my hard work, @steemcurator01 has been mentioned an additional 20+ times. They've been asked to write a post to clarify their position which they quite simply shouldn't need to do.
From my point of view though, that's not the worst of it... My desire to improve things has resulted in me being accused of having "bad intentions" amongst other things. I didn't notice anybody replying to that comment regarding a lack of respect.
Back to the point of your comment... I understand that the use of the phrase "incapable of thinking" to describe people waiting to be told what to do is disrespectful and I have edited it accordingly.
Unfortunately many do not know the power of the word, I apologize for those who have offended you. The idea is not against the tool, it is exceptional, it allows us to know in an optimal way the balance of an account, but it is necessary to refine it in order not to harm those who are somehow in the lower limit of the requirements as is the case of our friend edittacar86.
I invite you to continue developing your excellent work for the platform, I recognize your great talent for it, you should only rehearse and teach so that it is processed correctly by those who apply it.
In fact, I have a short question or suggestion: ¿Would it be possible to show 2 graphs, one that shows the general, ie, only transfer and on and a second graph showing the actual behavior as it was raised at the beginning?
That's easy to add so I've included it under a heading "Power Ups v. Transfers Out".
http://steemit.lovestoblog.com/clubstatus.php?author=adeljose
In my humble opinion, the first chart is the one to look at as primary, the detailed one is for further investigation you want to do on any user, either to corroborate Steem and SBD movements or confirm abuse.
In my case, you can see
If we look at the following first choice graph, it makes us stop on 2 aspects "knowing that I use the #club75 tag.
First, it clearly shows that I have only turned on 70% of my rewards, and second, it creates uncertainty as to how the Steem liquid balance will be interpreted, which is clearly affecting my inclusion to #club75, this is what we must be careful about.
That is why, in my opinion, this more detailed chart should be put on the back burner, just for the purpose of studying openly confusing cases.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the application, just the data that can be seen at first glance.
I understand although when designing this page, I did it with the mindset of "one day, clubs won't be needed"... so although I positioned it as a useful tool to check club status (which it is but I wish I hadn't said that), the day that Steemit doesn't "incentivise" people to power up will eventually come. At which point, the "where has STEEM/SBD come from and where is it going" will always be the most important thing on this page.
Thank you for the suggestion of including Power Ups v. Transfers Out and I wish that somebody had suggested it more than 24 hours ago.
I really, really can't emphasise enough how badly I don't want to think about or write about this tool ever again.
Go ahead, the thing is not for bad, in my case, it was only due to reading and interpretation of the information and the action generated, if I may, I let you know in the comment you left to the friend edittacar86.
You are brilliant, you should know that every creation brings a brainstorm of ideas and perspectives that can improve such creation.
Sungguh gembira rasanya bila sang lumba-lumba telah ditaklukkan di hati semoga saya bisa mendapatkan sang lumba-lumba untuk kedepannya 🐬❤️😘