RE: Who benefits from Community Curators Accounts SC04-08?
In the case of Iftar Food Package Distribution, when SC01 and SC07 votes are given on the same post, the reason is that the SC07 curation account gave the vote first, here is the link and then SC01 came to give out the vote the next day, link.
In the case of Writing Event News Release, the author has mentioned that they contacted the local news portals to write a story on their event, and has also made public what they wanted the local news portals to publish.
I would request you to go through the post again. I think the post is rightly posted in the #steem-growth tag as it helps advertise the name of Steem when local news portals are involved. Maybe the curation done on the #writing part should be done considering the #steem-growth tag only.
In the case of Business Activity Post, the author is running a business and has made/designed and printed a banner for promoting an event. So I guess two curators getting confused who gives out the vote is understandable, as both #business and #steemgrowth.
But in this case, I would like to point out that even though the author did not use any of the Lifestyle tags, they received votes from the lifestyle curation team.
In both of the other cases, where booming support and curation team support is given, I think the author deserves the reward.
There are many times when people are trying to game the system and trying to withdraw all of the rewards. But in this case, I don't think that the author is guilty of something.
The discrepancies you showed above are there because you concluded that a person should not be rewarded constantly. I don't think somebody should be judged on this basis.
Do you really think that so many people are involved in some mega plan to reward only this user? Maybe a few mistakes can be pointed out but the whole system cannot be working towards rewarding a single user.
Hi @cryptogecko, it is awkward that you felt that this post is a blame towards yourself. If you see it was nothing in the post that criticized anyone, but it was simply listing the facts and it is as it is, black on white and it is not me who thought it out.
Your statement:
made me think about conspiracy theorists.
Nevertheless, the questions is:
As you know even SC01-02 do not come on daily basis and @booming rule do not vote more than twice a week one user.
@steemcurator01 would be good to hear your opinion, as the Steemit Team created this Initiative.
I did not take it personally.
I just felt that if someone who has a good reputation is blamed, we should first check it out, and I did that only.
The whole goal of the post is:
?
I think if a user is persistent in creating exceptional content throughout the week, and all of them are strategically posted in different themes then they will be getting 2x5 which equals 10 votes from SC04-08 accounts, isn't that so?
And if they are also participating in the community tasks, then why not booming X2 votes per week.
That makes it 12 votes from SC04-08 and Booming accounts in a week.
And also if SC01-02 are willing to give extra rewards then good for the author.
Why shouldn't we promote such a behaviour where an author is rewarded for creating exceptional content and this only gives out positive message to other authors.
Currently there is a multiple account and plagiarism pandemic going on, on the Steemit platform. I think we can only tackle that if more people see that their efforts are being rewarded everytime.
In his case few posts were upvoted by two SC accounts but only one posts with multiple tags. If we think like you then only few will receive only Upvotes and the rest will leave the platform
I agree that what happened on one or two posts should not happen as two curators should not vote on a single post. That is curators's fault.
BINGO!!! that is the whole point, thank you we finally came to the same conclusion!
Point 1 - This post fully deserved the up vote from my side as it was a great post supporting what #steemgrowth and the development thereof stands for.
And you are right, I was first (•ิ‿•ิ)