RE: Something Useful For Blockchain
Yes, Moecki, you're right. I have missed such a detailed, constructive discussion here on the Steem for ages. Such great ideas have come to light, which have been discussed objectively, taking into account advantages and disadvantages - there must be something that can be implemented.
And that's why I think the Steemit team should definitely take note of it.
Dear Steemit team (@steemitblog / @steemcurator01), please don't mind, this mention is necessary. Please take the time to study the discussion below this post. There are a great many approaches and multi-layered trains of thought in it that could possibly lead to positive changes on the platform if, after consideration, one or the other suggestion were to be implemented.
Perhaps you would like to join the discussion and make a statement - after all, it is also about you and your possibilities.
Thank you... ;-))
While reading, I often pondered whether I should reply to one or more comments. But in the end I didn't want to decide which comment I should reply to. There was simply too much information and points of reference. So I decided to support the project by promoting it.
I hope the Steemit team will also take the time to read and consider... and a comment in response would also be very welcome.
👍
Although I would have liked to read your opinion on one or two points. Well, on the other hand, I think I know it - we think quite similarly in this respect... 😎
At least they have noticed the discussion, are still "digesting" according to their own statement and will certainly get in touch.
I think so too. I will perhaps still comment on one or two thoughts. :-))
I hope so. It would be important and nice that they remain in dialogue. And they should definitely consider what a "thoughtless" statement can do (#burnsteem25).
Following. Reading. Observing. Digesting. Waiting for a small break in the clouds to reply...
Almost upvoted, but I caught myself. ;-)
Great, thank you.
I am very much looking forward to your response, your thoughts.
I hope the "digesting" doesn't cause any stomach ache. If it does, it can only be due to a possible misunderstanding of the wording, so if in doubt, better ask... 😉
Apologies for the delay. After holidays and all that, finally some time to join in.
Thank you for all this very useful discussion. Will drop responses on some of the comments.
Some things we can influence, others are beyond our control.
There are always two sides to every Coin...
No problem. I'm just glad you took the time to reply in detail now. That's the kind of appreciation I appreciate. The appreciation of engagement that is not "forced".
Sure. Above all, even a steemit team cannot dance at all weddings.
By the way, the fact that this is so often expected of you is something that often annoys me as a long-term user of this platform and almost makes me lose faith in the fact that there must be more people who understand the meaning of this blockchain regardless of a sc01 vote.
Definitely. This makes it all the more important to turn over the coins regularly and to reflect and evaluate them again and again. Resting on a certain status quo inhibits further development and makes life (including the Steemit life) boring in the long run. I am not mainly pointing at you, but at a large part of your "faithful", unreflective followers.
What I actually want to say with once again far too many words: I too will take the time to respond to your detailed answer, but I don't want to "shoot it out" quickly and now I have to go to work. I will get back to you. Until then, thank you for your open ear - and a sign in which I perceived with a smile (not for the first time) that we are actually swimming on a similar wave... ;-)