I'm going to write a little bit about these issues. Because there are some friends involved. If I were a curator or whatever it is that has relevance on the platform. I would definitely use the strategy of helping and motivating in the first place. Commenting from the positivity and responsibility involved. Then assess the quality of the work and the artists in general. Diamonds are needed, not quartz, so to speak. The artist must also be receptive, wanting to improve. No matter where the work is, there is always room for improvement. Then there is the unusable chaff that does not want to be molded. I would also be more ironclad against plagiarism and the use of AIs.
Notifications get me into action. They keep me active. So I see them as a positive.
Followers are that flowery paradise, which points to the welcome you get in a community. They imply growth, accountability and goals. I don't think everyone sees it this way. There are bound to be naysayers. Free thinkers. Some anarchists. But it's all good. Controversy is good. It makes you do things. Unless you live in the Arctic and have no steem. And you dream of a bag of potato chips. And you want to color, but it's -80 degrees and you don't have a red sweatshirt. So would you mind writing? Have you traveled to Cuba? Would you like to visit Cuba?
Do you know what fractal geometry is? My style is fractal. I'm from another latitude. The place where I write is the center of the universe I inhabit.

@wakeupkitty @aneukpineung78