RE: Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 263) in the WOX
Here we can see an example of what can be generated with AI, or perhaps it is a coincidence that we think almost the same regarding the pros and cons that an investor can generate for the platform.
https://steemit.com/hive-185836/@adeljose/sq3eu8
- Comment by Kasio:
You are absolutely right - investment takes many forms, whether it is time, effort, or money. It is natural for investors to seek returns, but maintaining the health of the platform requires a large and loyal community of committed users. Those who invest their time in posting and commenting must add value to their activities, such as increasing Steem Power.As for financial investors, they are entitled to employ strategies to generate profits as long as these strategies are organic and benign. Some simply sell their votes, others rent out their voting power (SP), and others create feedback loops by posting content to support their own accounts, and even create additional accounts to improve performance.In my view, the integrity of the Steemit platform can be damaged if investors engage in malicious activities, such as posting weak or duplicate content, stealing content, repeatedly draining wallets, or creating fake accounts to obtain rewards. Maintaining a balance between different types of contributions is essential to ensuring the health and sustainability of the platform.
- My comment:
It is very true, it requires a large community of users committed to the well-being of the platform, those who invest time to publish and comment must also add value to their activity; how, for example, to add Steem Power. Money investors have the right to use strategies to generate profits, as long as they are organic, some limit themselves to selling their votes, others to rent their SP, just as there are those who generate a kind of feedback, that is, they publish to support their own content, they even create other accounts for greater performance. According to my point of view, different investors can damage the integrity of Steemit if they generate harmful activity, such as sharing garbage and/or plagiarized content, constantly emptying the wallet, creating spam accounts as a means to obtain rewards.
That's just bizarre. AI?
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.29 SP
Maybe it would be good to add the following topic to the Quiz:
Is this paragraph written by a human or by AI?
It's just bizarre. It doesn't read like it's AI. It's almost like it's been put into one of those "word spinner" tools. Which again, would be a very strange thing to do.
If it is a tool for paraphrasing, I think it does not add content.
So it's definitely possible. And this user does say how he likes to use AI.
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.28 SP
Yeah, I like using AI, not only for using and creating ML models, i'm thinking to post as teacher her for teaching machine learning. As I mentioned, I read @adeljose comments, and I agree with them. That's why I wrote it like that. he only talk about part of my comment, not the entire thing , that's all my comment
No, I just read your opinion first, and I agree with it. Yeah, I shouldn't repeat the same opinion; I may should said my opinon like @adeljose in investment. Haha, trust me, it's not AI. I can share how I'm making the translation from Arabic to English.
Ah ok... Don't worry, paraphrasing content can come in various forms and/or tools, but they are only effective if those who read the articles do not retain what they write (original author), or what they read (reader of the article). When I read your comment; I said to myself, this friend thinks the same as me, but I stopped to look at my comment, and with simple analysis, the similarity was noticeable.
Yeah, you're right, and I'm sorry. You know, sometimes a person can be influenced from others .
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.28 SP
It is about asking a question + adding your text.
AI tends to play on safe if you ask something. This is what I find most annoying and the chat bot that I tested, meant to stop people from committing suicide, did the same with the result I was ready to jump within 12 hours same for my kid.
Look at the first sentence. It's always the same. Now look at your first sentence... It is a different word choice.
This type of comments are popular as well, very popular, the "summary" of what the author wrote is received as a comment.
P. S. The 2nd part text is glued together or mistakes are added to mislead the reader/checker but again the same start and writingstyle = please the reader + lecturing.
🍀♥️