当谎言成为喜剧:一场关于人性的荒诞狂欢

in STEEM CN/中文13 hours ago

image.png

春节期间,我和家人一起观看了话剧《开心晚宴》。这部充满黑色幽默的作品,以其荒诞的情节和辛辣的讽刺,给我们带来了一场别开生面的精神盛宴。

一、谎言的多米诺骨牌

故事的主角孙艺德,是一个典型的中年成功人士。他开着豪车,住着豪宅,却在感情世界里迷失了方向。为了掩盖自己与模特莉莉的关系,他编造了一个又一个谎言。这些谎言就像多米诺骨牌一样,一旦开始就无法停止。

他的妻子发现了他的异常,于是他也开始怀疑起妻子来。这种互相猜忌的心理,让整个家庭关系变得岌岌可危。更荒诞的是,他们竟然找来了共同的老同学阿布来帮忙圆谎。这个看似聪明的决定,却让整个局面变得更加不可收拾。

在这场谎言的游戏中,每个人都成为了演员。他们戴着不同的面具,在爱情、友情、亲情之间来回切换。这种身份的不断转换,让人不禁想起莎士比亚笔下的弄臣们。

二、人性的荒诞剧场

在这部剧中,每个人都在表演。孙艺德在表演一个忠诚的丈夫,他的妻子在表演一个贤惠的妻子,阿布在表演一个可靠的朋友。就连无辜卷入这场风波的厨师丽丽,也在不断地变换着自己的身份。

这种集体性的表演,折射出当代社会中普遍存在的虚伪性。我们每个人都在生活中扮演着不同的角色,有时连自己都分不清哪个才是真实的自我。这种身份认同的危机,在这部剧中得到了淋漓尽致的展现。

更值得深思的是,这些谎言最终并没有被揭穿。相反,每个人都从中获得了自己想要的东西。这种结局看似圆满,实则充满了讽刺意味。它暗示着,在这个功利主义盛行的时代,谎言有时候反而比真相更容易让人接受。

三、对现实的尖锐反思

这部话剧最令人震撼的地方,在于它对现代社会道德困境的深刻剖析。它告诉我们,在这个物欲横流的时代,金钱和权力往往会扭曲人的本性。那些看似光鲜亮丽的成功人士,内心深处可能正经历着巨大的道德困境。

剧中人物之间的相互背叛和欺骗,表面上看起来荒诞可笑,但实际上却反映了当下社会中普遍存在的信任危机。我们习惯了怀疑一切,习惯了用谎言来保护自己。这种集体性的防卫机制,正在逐渐侵蚀着人与人之间的信任基础。

然而,这部剧并没有给出明确的答案。它只是提出了一个个发人深省的问题:在这个充满不确定性的世界里,我们还能相信什么?爱情、友情、亲情,这些曾经被视为人生最重要的东西,是否真的值得我们去相信?

四、结语:在荒诞中寻找真实

看完这部话剧后,我的内心久久不能平静。它让我意识到,在这个充满谎言的世界里,或许荒诞本身就是一种真实。我们每个人都在表演,在伪装,在编织谎言。但正是在这种荒诞中,我们才能更清楚地看到自己的真实面目。

这部剧没有给我们任何简单的答案,但它给了我们一个重新审视自己、审视这个世界的机会。也许这才是艺术最大的魅力——它让我们在笑声中思考,在荒诞中寻找真实。

在这个充满不确定性的时代里,或许我们都需要学会在荒诞中保持清醒,在虚伪中坚守真实。毕竟,只有直面自己的真实情感,我们才能找到真正的幸福与满足。

好吧!这篇文章是让deepseek R1替我改写的,这文笔和思想深度,让我有些震惊了。感觉以后耍笔杆子为生的人危险了。我的原文如下:

平时老婆都比较关注优惠信息,春节期间。老婆在武汉文旅平台上用优惠价抢到了三张话剧票。正好我们家三口。可以一起去看。话剧的名称叫开心晚宴。故事其实很简单。这是年近中年。事业有成,成为公司ceo的中年男主孙艺德。想赶快把老婆送回娘家,好在家给自己的模特小情人莉莉办生日晚宴。结果被老婆发现破绽。于是忽悠老婆说说是晚上宴请老同学阿布结果,他老婆一听。就不走了,这个阿布原来是他老婆的情人。他老婆想趁机和情人阿布幽会,两人都在欺骗对方,背叛对方。而孙立德的老同学阿布一面背叛他。做他老婆的情人,一面还要帮助孙立德欺骗他老婆,说模特莉莉是他的情人。别提有多别扭了。为了让这乱成一锅粥的关系。更混乱,更拧巴,还让阿布把做饭的厨师,丽丽错当成了模特莉莉,而模特莉莉还得去反串厨师。而这一群人就像马戏团里的杂耍演员玩抛接球一样用一个又一个的谎言,去圆其他的谎言。当然为了制造喜剧效果,这些即兴的谎言总能蒙混过关直到最后,大家才真相大白。而那个无辜卷入这个漩涡中的厨师丽丽在这个谎言游戏中左右逢源不断的变换身份为主人公们撒谎圆谎,赚得盆满钵满。因为他每撒一次谎,就会趁机加价要钱,甚至还顺走了孙立德给模特莉莉买的昂贵大衣,为了谎言不穿帮,大衣的真正主人也只能打掉牙往肚里吞。本来还担心这么成人化的剧情。小宝贝看不看得懂,没想到她还看得津津有味,哈哈大笑了。就像我们学生时代写作文一样,结尾都要拔高一下。在话剧结尾,主要演员每人发出来一句灵魂的拷问。你相信你的妻子吗,你相信你的丈夫吗?你相信你的朋友吗?你相信你赚到的钱吗?你相信付出就有回报吗?如果从这部话剧的剧情来看,上面答案显然都是否定的。但显然并不是每个人的经历,每个人的看法都是如此。虽然这部话剧的进行很搞笑,但隐隐中似乎传达了不太好的观念仿佛就是富人都是不道德的,有故意迎合底层民众的嫌疑。


image.png

During the Spring Festival, I watched the drama Happy Dinner with my family. This work full of black humor, with its absurd plot and spicy satire, brings us a unique spiritual feast.

Dominoes of lies

The protagonist of the story, Sun Yide, is a typical middle-aged successful person. He drives a fancy car and lives in a mansion, but he's lost in the world of love. In order to cover up his relationship with model Lily, he invented one lie after another. These lies are like dominoes, once they start they can't be stopped.

His wife noticed something unusual about him, and he began to suspect her. This kind of mutual suspicion makes the whole family relationship become precarious. What is more absurd is that they actually found a common old classmate ABU to help lie. This seemingly smart decision made the whole situation even worse.

In this game of lies, everyone becomes an actor. They wear different masks, switching back and forth between love, friendship, and affection. This constant shift in identity is reminiscent of Shakespeare's jesters.

Two, the absurd theater of human nature

In this play, everyone is acting. Sun Yide is acting as a loyal husband, his wife is acting as a virtuous wife, and ABU is acting as a reliable friend. Even the innocent cook Lili involved in this storm is constantly changing her identity.

This collective performance reflects the widespread hypocrisy in contemporary society. Each of us plays a different role in life, and sometimes we can't even tell which is our true self. This crisis of identity is on full display in the play.

What is even more noteworthy is that these lies were not exposed in the end. Instead, everyone gets what they want out of it. This seemingly happy ending is full of irony. It suggests that in this age of utilitarianism, lies are sometimes easier to accept than the truth.

  1. Sharp reflection on reality

The most shocking thing about this play is its profound analysis of the moral dilemma in modern society. It tells us that in this materialistic age, money and power often distort human nature. People who seem glamorous and successful may, deep down, be experiencing a huge moral dilemma.

The betrayal and deception between the characters in the play seem absurd on the surface, but in fact, it reflects the crisis of trust that exists in the current society. We're used to doubting everything, to lying to protect ourselves. This collective defense mechanism is gradually eroding the foundation of trust between people.

However, the show doesn't offer a definitive answer. It just raises sobering questions: In a world of uncertainty, what can we believe? Love, friendship, family, these were once regarded as the most important things in life, is it really worth us to believe?

Conclusion: Finding truth in absurdity

After watching this drama, my heart could not calm down for a long time. It made me realize that in a world full of lies, maybe absurdity is itself a kind of truth. Each of us is acting, pretending, fabricating lies. But it is in this absurdity that we can see our true face more clearly.

The show doesn't give us any easy answers, but it gives us a chance to re-examine ourselves and the world. Perhaps this is the greatest charm of art - it makes us think in laughter and find the truth in the absurd.

In this era of uncertainty, perhaps we all need to learn to stay awake in the absurd and stick to the truth in the hypocrisy. After all, it is only by confronting our true feelings that we can find true happiness and fulfillment.

As you wish! This article was rewritten by deepseek R1 for me, and I was shocked by the depth of writing and thought. I feel like people who make a living by writing are in danger. My original text is as follows:

Usually the wife is more concerned about preferential information during the Spring Festival. Wife in Wuhan cultural travel platform with preferential prices to grab three drama tickets. There are three of us. We can go together. The name of the play is Happy Dinner. The story is simple. This is near middle age. Successful career, become the company ceo middle-aged male master Sun Yide. I want to send my wife back to her mother's house so that I can have a birthday dinner for my model lover Lily. Only to be found out by my wife. So the wife said that the evening banquet old classmate ABU results, his wife a listen. I'm not leaving. This ABU turned out to be his wife's lover. His wife wants to take the opportunity and lover ABU tryst, two people are cheating each other, betray each other. And Sun Lide's old classmate ABU betrayed him. Do his wife's lover, but also help Sun Lide deceive his wife, said model Lily is his lover. Don't mention how awkward it is. To make this all a mess. More chaotic, more twisted bar, but also let ABU cook the cook, Lily mistaken for the model Lily, and the model Lily has to go to the chef. And this group of people is like a circus juggler playing catch with one lie after another, rounding off another lie. Of course, for comic effect, these improvised lies can always be fudged until, in the end, the truth is revealed. And the innocent involved in the vortex of the cook Lili in the lie game in the left and right constantly change the identity of the protagonists lie, make POTS full of money. Because every time he tells a lie, he will take the opportunity to raise the price for money, and even took the expensive coat Sun Lide bought for model Lily, in order to lie without wearing help, the real owner of the coat can only knock out his teeth to swallow. I was worried about such an adult drama. Little baby see not understand, did not expect that she also saw with relish, haha laugh. Just like when we were writing essays in school, we always have to end on a high note. At the end of the play, the main actors each give a soul-interrogation. Do you trust your wife? Do you trust your husband? Do you trust your friend? Do you believe the money you make? Do you believe that work pays off? If the plot of the play is anything to go by, the answer is obviously no. But obviously it's not everyone's experience, it's not everyone's perception. Although the play is very funny, it seems to convey the uncomfortable idea that the rich are immoral and intentionally pandering to the lower class.

Sort:  

Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.23
JST 0.034
BTC 101774.70
ETH 2884.05
SBD 3.22