You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Beauty of Doing Nothing
Hello, friend! Thank you for your support. However, I would like to ask about your team's curation mechanism, particularly regarding the percentage of support. My recent post was supported with 5%, and I want to confirm if that was intentional or an error.
If it's intentional, could you please explain your team's curation criteria?
C.c : @httr4life
The AI detector I used gave a small reading (not a failing grade), but I believe the story was worthy of a reward. If zero AI was present, it would have gotten more. I am giving your comment 10%, though, to add to the reward.
Thank you for your honest reply. However, as mentioned, the AI detector showed a small proportion of AI positivity in my case below 10%, which is natural and likely due to the low accuracy of these tools.
For your information, as Sc01 clearly instructed, only content with over 90% AI positivity will be considered AI-generated due to the tools' low accuracy. Anything below that threshold should not be classified as such.
Once again, thank you for your time.
Regards ,
C.c : @httr4life