You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: MAXUV Weekly Statement & Token Distribution - over 25% APR - 19 July 2020 [MAP Steem FinTech]
Hello @maxuv.
The content of this post is very similar to this publication:
https://game.dclick.io/posts/@maxuv/maxuv-weekly-statement-and-token-distribution-19-april-2020-map-steem-fintech
There are only a few changes, but both items look similar.
Could we consider this article as content plagiarism?
Of course they look similar, they are weekly reports. They are written for the benefit of members so they know where the information is.
How do I "plagiarise" myself? And FYI, many accounts that posted template-based newsletters etc were whitelisted by cheetah precisely coz the content changes even if the template stays the same.
Thanks for your explanation.
I'm sorry for your obfuscated tone. I didn't mean to bother you.
Thank you for choosing Project Hope to share your weekly report (template) with us.
Although I do not believe that this type of publication gains traction within our community since it does not generate any type of interaction or feedback between members.
Finally, I want to make it clear that I did not accuse you of plagiarism.
It has been a pleasure to talk with you.
Many thanks. In my chats with Piotr, we thought we'd give this a try for a couple of months. If, as you say, the posts do not seem so popular, then can review it. Would be good to have more info and discussion about the Steem economy, but that seems unlikely if anything negative is taken as being anti-platform when it could just be the ebb and flow of the economic system. (Not saying that about PH, just the general tribalism across similar platforms.)